Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 8:26 p.m. No.24621043   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1049 >>1056 >>1057 >>1216 >>1314 >>1498

USAO Central District of California

Announcement of Voter Fraud and Hate Crime Cases

U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet K. Dhillon along with First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli and Patrick Grandy, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office announce a plea agreement in a voter fraud case and an arrest in a hate crime case. Assistant United States Attorneys Michael Wheat and Nandor Kiss of the Orange County Office are prosecuting the voter fraud case. Assistant United States Attorney Laura A. Alexander of the Public Corruption and Civil Rights Section and Trial Attorney Erica O’Connell with the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division are prosecuting the hate crime case.

 

9 hours ago May 18, 2026 90 views 27:50

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc6GAiC5my4

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 8:30 p.m. No.24621049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1050 >>1056 >>1057 >>1216 >>1314 >>1498

>>24621043

Marina del Rey Woman Federally Charged with Paying Individuals, Including Homeless People on L.A.’s Skid Row, to Register to Vote

 

LOS ANGELES – A Marina del Rey woman who worked as a longtime signature collector for ballot initiatives has been charged with paying individuals – including homeless people living in the Skid Row area of downtown Los Angeles – to register to vote, the Justice Department announced today.

 

Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, 64, a.k.a. “Anika,” is charged with one felony count of paying another person to register to vote, a federal charge that carries a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.

 

Armstrong has agreed to plead guilty to the charge and is scheduled to make her initial appearance this morning in United States District Court in Santa Ana. She is expected to plead guilty in the coming weeks.

 

“False registrations undermine Americans’ faith in elections – even more so when payoffs are involved,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Civil Rights Division. “This Justice Department is committed to ensuring that all U.S. elections are fair and free from illegal meddling – so that all Americans can accept the results with confidence.”

 

According to her plea agreement, for approximately 20 years, Armstrong periodically worked as a “petition circulator.” In that role, she was paid by individuals and entities – known as “coordinators” – to collect voter signatures on official petitions that qualify initiatives, referendums, and recalls for California state ballots. Armstrong drove around the Los Angeles area to find registered voters to sign the petitions. …

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/marina-del-rey-woman-federally-charged-paying-individuals-including-homeless-people

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 8:32 p.m. No.24621051   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1056 >>1216 >>1314 >>1498

Carlsbad Man Arrested on Federal Indictment Charging Him with Assaulting Jewish Man Near Pico-Robertson Synagogue

 

LOS ANGELES – A San Diego County man was arrested today on a federal grand jury indictment charging him with assaulting a Jewish man near a synagogue in the Pico-Robertson area of Los Angeles, which was hosting an event to promote the purchase of real estate in Israel – an event protested by several pro-Palestinian groups.

 

Zaid Gitesatani, 28, of Carlsbad, is charged with one count of hate crime. He is expected to make his initial appearance this afternoon in United States District Court in downtown Los Angeles.

 

“The defendant’s conduct, if proven, is a serious violation of the law – every American deserves to live without fear of violence based on who he is or how he worships,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Civil Rights Division. “The Justice Department is committed to vigorously prosecuting such crimes of hate and violence.”

 

According to the indictment that a federal grand jury returned on May 5, a real estate agency known as “My Home in Israel” advertised an event scheduled for June 23, 2024, at the Adas Torah Synagogue in L.A.’s Pico-Robertson neighborhood. The event was to promote land for sale in Israel.

 

Several pro-Palestinian groups then planned for and advertised a protest to take place at this event. One of those groups advertised a protest to “stand against settler expansion.” Gitesatani traveled to Los Angeles to attend this protest.

 

On the afternoon of the real estate event and protest, a Jewish man identified in the indictment as “Victim A” was walking his dog near the Adas Torah Synagogue when Gitesatani approached him from behind and punched him in the jaw, resulting in pain, redness, and swelling. After assaulting the victim, Gitesatani walked away and retreated into the crowd.

 

On the same day he assaulted Victim A, Gitesatani posted to his personal Instagram account a screenshot of his assault, a message that read, “Whooped the Zios today and we took their flag,” and two images of himself displaying his bruised knuckles following the assault. …

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/carlsbad-man-arrested-federal-indictment-charging-him-assaulting-jewish-man-near-pico

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 8:35 p.m. No.24621056   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24621043

>USAO Central District of California

>Announcement of Voter Fraud and Hate Crime Cases

>>24621049

>Woman Federally Charged with Paying Individuals, Including Homeless People on L.A.’s Skid Row, to Register to Vote

>>24621051

>Man Arrested on Federal Indictment Charging Him with Assaulting Jewish Man

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:05 p.m. No.24621092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1216 >>1314 >>1498

US Airports Get Nearly $1 Billion for Family-Friendly Upgrades: Duffy

The Federal Aviation Administration has awarded 133 grants to airports in 45 states for play areas, nursing rooms, and family security lanes.

 

The Federal Aviation Administration has invested $970 million to make airports more family-friendly, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy announced Monday.

Airports in 45 states will get upgrades that will include new children’s play spaces, mother’s rooms (also known as nursing rooms), family security lanes, and sensory rooms for children with special needs.

The new program is called the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act’s Airport Terminal Program.

“This administration is focused on making travel happier and more convenient for American families. The Golden Age of Travel includes a Family First agenda,” Duffy said in a statement. “We’re making airports inviting spaces for parents and children to relax and recharge prior to boarding.”

Airports will receive between $2 million and $10 million each.

Tupelo Regional Airport in Mississippi, which serves around 30,000 passengers annually, will receive $2 million for a family-friendly security lane, while the mid-sized Donald J. Trump International Airport in Palm Beach, which serves over 8.6 million passengers annually, will get $10 million for new restrooms, mother’s rooms, and a sensory room.

The large hub of Boston’s Logan International Airport, which serves over 43.2 million passengers a year, will receive $2.8 million to renovate four Kidsports play areas, while the massive Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, with over 85.6 million passengers a year, will get $8 million to update five restrooms with family-friendly features.

“The FAA is moving quickly to get these investments out the door and into airports nationwide,” FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said in a statement. “These projects will help create a more welcoming and accessible travel experience for families while demonstrating our commitment to improving America’s airports at record speed.”

Duffy had announced the plan, dubbed the “Make Travel Family Friendly Again” campaign, five months earlier.

In December 2025, the Transportation Department had asked airports to submit projects focused on family travel needs, including children’s play areas, exercise spaces, mother’s rooms, nursing pods, family security lanes, and sensory rooms.

The department set aside roughly $1 billion in grants to improve airport experiences for families and provide healthier food options. Duffy made the announcement in December alongside Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other health influencers.

“It’s not been a healthy experience for them,” Kennedy said, referring to the 3 million Americans who pass through the nation’s airports each year, adding that airports are “where healthy diets go to die.”

“The food that’s available in the airport, a lot of it tastes very good, but it’s not very good for you,” Kennedy said. “It’s deep-fried food. It’s sugar bombs. It’s ultra-processed foods. And all of them are going to leave you sicker than before you ate them.”

Kennedy also said airports lack nursing spaces, nursing pods, and nursing rooms.

The HHS is encouraging mothers to breastfeed babies as long as possible, according to Kennedy.

“There is no better food for your brain, for your gut microbiome, for your physical growth, for your emotional growth, than what’s in God-given breast milk,” Kennedy added.

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/us-airports-get-nearly-1-billion-for-family-friendly-upgrades-duffy-6027680

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:07 p.m. No.24621094   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1216 >>1314 >>1498

Trump to Seek DOJ Investigation of Mail-In Ballot Error in Maryland

The state Board of Elections said that some voters had received the wrong party’s ballot for the June primary because of a vendor error.

 

President Donald Trump said on May 18 that he will ask the Department of Justice (DOJ) to launch a probe into a mail-in ballot error in Maryland.

Trump’s statement came after the Maryland Board of Elections announced on May 15 that some voters had received the wrong party’s ballot for the primary, which will be held on June 23. The agency attributed the issue to a vendor error and said that replacement ballots were being issued.

Maryland State Administrator of Elections Jared DeMarinis said over 500,000 voters requested mail-in ballots. But the error affected only voters who mailed their ballots before May 14, according to the board.

In a Truth Social post, Trump accused Gov. Wes Moore of allowing the error for political reasons.

“In Maryland, they sent out 500,000 Illegal Mail In Ballots, and they got caught! So now, they’re going to send out 500,000 more Mail In Ballots, but nobody knows what’s happening with the first 500,000 they sent.

“[Moore] allowed this to happen in order to make sure that Democrats win. It never made sense to me that Maryland was considered an automatic Democrat State, but now I see why. I’m sure this has gone on for years,” the president wrote.

The Epoch Times has reached out to Moore’s office for comment but did not receive a response by publication time.

Speaking to reporters at a May 18 health care affordability event, Trump said he was very concerned about mail-in ballots and raised questions about the ballots incorrectly mailed to Maryland voters.

“When they were caught, they said, ‘Oh, we'll pull them back,’ and they issued 500,000 new ballots, and, as you know, they never got the original ballots back, so there are a million ballots out there. Many of them went to Democrats, and it’s a very serious thing,” he said.

The state board of elections stated on its website that election officials have put in place safeguards to ensure that only one ballot can be accepted per voter, preventing any risk of duplicate voting after the error.

“Every return envelope/oath has a unique identifier to ensure that a voter can only vote one ballot. [The Board of Elections] has implemented additional safeguards to ensure only the correct ballot is counted for each voter,” it said.

 

This is a developing story and will be updated.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-to-seek-doj-investigation-of-mail-in-ballot-error-in-maryland-6027707

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:30 p.m. No.24621130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1139 >>1152

May 18, 2026, 3:00 AM ET

EXCLUSIVE: An hour in the Oval Office with the CEO-in-Chief, President Trump

By Alyson Shontell [Fortune] Editor-in-Chief and Chief Content Officer

 

President Trump can’t believe Jensen Huang doesn’t own his own plane.

 

Hours before he departs for his highly anticipated China summit, the president has been arranging for the billionaire cofounder of Nvidia to join the who’s who of Fortune 500 CEOs preparing to travel to Beijing. Also in the group are Citigroup’s Jane Fraser, arguably the most powerful woman in finance, and Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, who recently gave the president an honorary (if slightly tongue-in-cheek) “Salesman of the Year” award for helping the jetmaker sell hundreds of planes.

 

Huang is a late but welcome addition to the party. For one of America’s most successful CEOs and the man whose company’s chips power the AI boom, the president is happy to make room, and Huang winds up hitching a ride aboard Air Force One, sharing the jet with Elon Musk, among others. The only reason Huang wasn’t included earlier is because he didn’t call to ask.

 

As I sit across the Resolute Desk from the president in the Oval Office while we talk about his upcoming trip, it’s clear that arrangements like this are exactly the kind of deal the president likes to make—quick, informal, and one in which he can declare himself a clear winner. He prides himself on his ability to get anyone on the phone and achieve measurable results, whether he’s talking with a world leader or an American company he wants to help.

 

In a wide-ranging conversation that spanned an hour—and covered topics from tariffs to AI data centers to the war in Iran—the president outlined the broader, top-down dealmaking mentality he’s using to try to reinvigorate the American economy. (A small group of Fortune Media executives joined us in Trump’s office; they did not take part in the interview.)

 

With the help of Wall Street–savvy cabinet members like Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Trump has turned old economic norms on their head. The president has been an evangelist for a healthy mix of new revenue streams generated by global tariffs and strategic equity investments, alongside trade megadeals designed to lure foreign investment back into the U.S. Trump’s twin goals: ending the trade imbalances that he argues have weakened America, and offsetting the ever-rising national debt.

 

Past presidents and Congresses, stuck in partisan gridlock, haven’t been able to deliver on these fronts. Trump’s response has been, essentially, to either steamroll or outright ignore the politicos and regulators. It’s a fast-paced one-man show that thrills his fans and makes his detractors sound the alarm on the ethics and the legality of it all.

 

“I make one of those deals every day that no normal person would make,” Trump says, while telling me about a possible railroad merger that he would want the government to have equity in. Musing on stakes his administration has claimed in companies like Intel and U.S. Steel, he continues, “Some people actually think it’s un-American, what I do. They say, ‘You’re taking their company away.’ ” Those critics aren’t seeing the big picture, he implies; after all, “We have $38 trillion in debt.”

 

Where the chips fall as a result of all this unorthodoxy—including the long-term, geopolitical reshuffling of alliances and partnerships it’s invoking—is still very much in question. There are enough proof points to suggest that the strategy has some merit, at least under a leader as forceful as Trump. U.S. stocks and corporate profits are showing surprising resiliency, reaching new highs this year—despite the inflation-driving Iran war “detour,” as President Trump likes to call it. The broader public is less convinced: Consumer confidence hit an all-time low in April, and approval of Trump’s management of the economy has plummeted in polls.

 

Even the bulls, however, have to grapple with some questions about the future. As any executive knows, no sturdy business can be built on the shoulders of a single person. So what will happen when the CEO-in-chief, who’s literally and figuratively remaking the White House, no longer lives there?

 

https://fortune.com/2026/05/18/trump-interview-economic-strategy-tariffs-ai-dealmaking-china-summit/

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:34 p.m. No.24621139   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1142 >>1152

>>24621130

>…

Inside Trump’s dealmaking mindset, via the Lincoln Memorial

When our conversation begins, the deal President Trump is most excited to talk about isn’t with Iran, or even with Chinese President Xi Jinping. It involves the iconic Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, which has been leaking and, he says, plaguing the otherwise beautiful National Mall.

 

“It’s been a disaster ever since it’s been built, because they put granite blocks there, and every stone is going to leak,” he tells me, saying the pool has become almost like a “garbage can.” The plan he says he was pitched to resurrect it would have cost roughly $350 million and taken four years to complete. Instead, Trump says, he found a fix that will cost significantly less. By treating the structure like one of his resort swimming pools—and using a contractor who worked on one of those pools—Trump figures he can keep the granite base, drop in a sturdy, leakproof shell, and voilà: problem solved.

 

Now, as Trump shows me a dozen images of the project underway, he’s on to which shade the shell should be—American flag blue? Or something darker to hide debris?

 

The president, of course, first established himself in real estate, and ideas about property keep popping up as we talk. A question about the AI race prompts Trump to recall visiting a vast data center with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. “The Pentagon was always the biggest building ever built,” he marvels. “That’s like a toy by comparison. These are the biggest buildings that anybody’s ever even envisioned.” (Trump now calls Zuckerberg “a very good friend” while quipping, “What a difference between [my] first administration,” when Trump sparred with Facebook repeatedly and later threatened to throw Zuckerberg in jail.)

 

Even the country’s intractable debt crisis draws real estate analogies. The country’s mounting red ink, the president notes, really is not so terrible if you think of it like a real estate mogul would: What’s the total value of America and its natural assets, he suggests, like the Grand Canyon, or even its surrounding oceans? “If you put down the value of these things, it’s like hundreds of trillions of dollars,” Trump says, and by that measure, “if you kept [the national debt] at $40 trillion, you’re way under-levered.”

 

As Fortune’s Geoff Colvin recently wrote, a life in real estate has shaped Trump’s leadership and decision-making style. Many big real estate players, including the Trump Organization, are controlled by one person or one family; negotiations happen face-to-face; deals happen fast. And even after five-and-a-half years in office, Trump still gets frustrated when government and policymaking don’t work that way.

 

Tariffs, equity stakes, and the $38 trillion question

“It really pisses me off,” the president groans, as we delve into the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that roughly half of last year’s Liberation Day tariffs were unconstitutional.

 

It’s not the ruling per se that he’s upset about, although he’s certainly not happy about it. He can find another way to implement tariffs, he says, just more slowly and under different laws. Instead of the $600 billion a year he estimates the U.S. would have raked in from his tariffs (a figure that has been disputed by some economists as widely overstated), Trump figures the new sum will be chopped nearly in half.

 

But what has specifically ticked him off is the fact that the ruling didn’t come with an asterisk that would have allowed him to keep all of the tariff revenue collected prior to the ruling. “Can you imagine—to people who hate us, to countries that ripped us off for years, I’ve got to give them back $149 billion.” (Research—some of it disputed by the White House—indicates that most of the tariffs were paid either by U.S. companies that imported goods from abroad, or by the consumers who bought those goods; those companies are eligible to claim refunds.)

 

There’s something deeper at stake. For decades, President Trump has backed steep taxes on imports, more recently calling tariffs the “most beautiful word in the dictionary.” In his second term, he and Lutnick envisioned tariffs bringing in new, meaningful revenue—even floating the idea of an “External Revenue Service”—that wouldn’t require hitting up Americans for more hard-earned dollars every tax season, or cutting benefits from Social Security or Medicare.

 

Another tentpole of this revenue strategy, though one involving much smaller sums for now, is corporate equity. On multiple occasions over the past two years, the Trump administration has taken a stake in an American corporation instead of offering a bailout, a tax subsidy, or a grant.

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:37 p.m. No.24621142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1144 >>1152 >>1172

>>24621139

>…

The Trump/Lutnick camp frames this as a smart way to help American businesses that find themselves in dire straits, while also allowing for potential return on investment. If the Treasury could get the kind of returns top venture capitalists and their limited partners make, it could eventually scale up to dent America’s deficit. If a company goes from bankrupt to billions, couldn’t it help Americans to share a piece of the pie?

 

The bear case: Truly free markets—a foundation of democracy—require the government not to meddle in corporate governance. Government equity stakes could make it highly tempting for a future administration to cross that line. (What’s more, most venture investments flop.)

 

For Trump, the decision to interject the government into a struggling American business seems to come down to both the opportunity and the ability of its leader to win him over personally. The textbook example of the equity strategy is Intel, in which Trump negotiated a 9.9% stake last summer worth about $10 billion.

 

The legendary chipmaker was struggling last year with problems including declining market share and a worrisome debt load. “[Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan] came in to see me,” Trump recalls. “I liked him, I thought he was good.” Trump also had leverage: substantial federal grants for chipmaking that had been earmarked, but not yet delivered, to Intel.

 

“I said, ‘Give the country 10% ownership for free in Intel,’ ” the president recalls. “He said, ‘You have a deal.’ I said, ‘Shit, I should have asked for more.’ ” The grants were converted into equity in August.

 

As Trump recounts the story, one of his aides whisks over with a computer printout of Intel’s stock performance chart and drops it into my lap. In just eight months, the government’s Intel position has grown to be worth more than $50 billion, Trump says. “Do I get credit for it? Does anybody even know I did that?”

 

When I ask what the government’s exit strategy could be, Trump doesn’t seem concerned. He thinks he could sell shares slowly over time without tanking the stock if he communicated his intentions properly to the market upfront.

 

Intel is a story where Trump’s equity strategy and his obsession with foreign competition intersect. “Intel should be the biggest company in the world right now,” Trump says. “If I had been president when all these companies started sending their chips in from China, I would have put a tariff on that would have protected Intel.” Referring to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), currently the world’s dominant chipmaker, he adds, “Intel would have all that business now, and there would be no Taiwan.”

 

Another American company experiencing the Trump dealmaker effect is Boeing. Aerospace is the industry in which the U.S. consistently runs a huge trade surplus (about $100 billion in 2024), and Boeing is by far that sector’s biggest exporter. In his flurry of trade diplomacy over the past two years, Trump has frequently nudged allies to commit to buying more jets. Lutnick told the All-In podcast that Boeing executives “follow me around like puppies” because Trump adds 50 to 100 planes to every big overseas deal.

 

Trump cheerfully tells me about being dubbed “Salesman of the Year” by Boeing CEO Ortberg, saying he’s far exceeded the number of planes sold by the best salesman Boeing itself ever employed. Indeed, three days after I meet with the president, Trump will announce in Beijing that China has agreed to buy 200 Boeing planes.

 

When I ask Trump what motivates him to moonlight as a Boeing-dealer-in-chief, he replies, “I want to help American companies. There’s nothing in it for me other than I want companies to do well.”

 

Inflation, war, and the limits of dealmaking

The morning of our meeting, the U.S. Senate approved a procedural vote that cleared the way for Kevin Warsh to be confirmed as the new Federal Reserve chair. That same day, the Bureau of Labor Statistics dropped the latest consumer price index, reporting that inflation had risen to 3.8%, up from just 3.3% the month prior.

 

The twin events are a reminder both of what the president wants to control, and what he can’t.

 

Warsh, of course, was vetted and nominated by Trump and shares the president’s general philosophy: Interest rates in America should be lower. Doing so, Trump argues, would not only boost the economy but would greatly reduce a major cost on America’s balance sheet: the roughly $3 billion per day it spends at the current rates to service the $38 trillion debt. (The Fed doesn’t control the interest rates paid on longer-term government debt—lots of factors, including the health of the economy and prevailing inflation, factor into the rates that investors demand when buying bonds—but a Fed chair committed to rate-cutting could presumably help at the margins.)

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:39 p.m. No.24621144   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1152 >>1172

>>24621142

>…

In the typical Fed playbook, of course, the need to combat inflation and the desire to cut rates are at odds. And with rising oil costs from the Iran war driving up inflation, the president seems resigned to the fact that he may have to wait for more cuts. “You can’t really look at the figures until the war is over,” he concedes.

 

Inflation, interest rates, and Iran have something in common: They’re problems that can’t be easily solved with personal dealmaking. The complex forces driving the Iran conflict include everything from a global nuclear-arms race to the forces of the energy markets to a seven-decade history of Iranian suspicion of U.S. hegemony. But even in the midst of war, Trump frames Iran’s leadership as though they’re more like a stubborn business rival.

 

“They scream all the time,” he says of the Iranians. “I can tell you one thing—they’re dying to sign [a deal]. But they make a deal, and then they send you a paper that has no relationship to the deal you made. I say, ‘Are you people crazy?’ ”

 

‘It’s not going to happen again’

Despite the Iran war and high oil prices, U.S. stocks are reeling off record after record. When I ask the president what he feels is behind the resilience, he replies, “We’re just strong.”

 

One source of that strength is capital expenditures by major tech companies: Amazon, Meta, and Alphabet, for example, are each pouring over $100 billion this year largely into AI-infrastructure-related expenses that are boosting the tech sector to mind-boggling heights.

 

Most Americans are not as bullish about AI as the markets are. Studies show the American public, fearing job losses and more social disruption, is significantly more pessimistic than China is about the technology, and some of the president’s AI advisors, like venture capitalist David Sacks, are worried the sentiment could cause America to lose the AI race.

 

When I ask the president about that anxiety, he doesn’t acknowledge the job fears but merely says that the power of AI can go both ways, and we need to be careful with it. “There’s power for good,” he says. “With medicine, I’ve already seen it.”

 

He notes that the deal he’s most proud of in AI is helping tech companies like Meta figure out how to build plants that can power their computing needs. “They need two times more electricity than we have right now,” he says. “We are beating China by a lot [in AI] because I allowed these plants to be built. These companies build their own electric units now, they don’t use the grid at all. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be able to compete … It’s important that we win.”

 

With all this talk of winning, I have to point out the obvious: None of these America-first deals the president is so proud of seem possible without him at the center. After all, can anyone really say no to the man who has said his power is only limited by his own morality? I ask how the dealmaking flow can be sustained once his term is up.

 

“Can’t answer that question,” Trump says. “I don’t know. I mean, it’s not going to happen again.”

 

It’s an answer no CEO could get away with giving—a business built on one person loses most of its underlying value once they leave. Apple, an American innovator turned dominant global success story, shows the value of strong succession plans: If it hadn’t had executive talent like John Ternus to lean on when Tim Cook retires, or if Steve Jobs hadn’t had Cook, the company would have spiraled.

 

Which tees up my final question: Who does the president feel can best carry on his dealmaking legacy? Don Jr., Marco Rubio, JD Vance? After I pose my question, I realize the vice president has quietly slipped into the back of the room and will catch Trump’s answer.

 

“Whoever gets this [job] is going to be very important,” the president says. “And if you get the wrong person: disaster.” 

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:43 p.m. No.24621152   🗄️.is 🔗kun

BUN: Fortune's Exclusive - An hour in the Oval Office with the CEO-in-Chief, President Trump

>>24621130 Part 1

>>24621139 Part 2

>Inside Trump’s dealmaking mindset, via the Lincoln Memorial

>Tariffs, equity stakes, and the $38 trillion question

>>24621142 Part 3

>Inflation, war, and the limits of dealmaking

>>24621144 Part 4

>‘It’s not going to happen again’

Anonymous ID: 76b237 May 18, 2026, 9:44 p.m. No.24621153   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1157 >>1173 >>1182 >>1206 >>1247

AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

If you think the left couldn't lose their minds any more than they are, imagine if Trump chopped the top off the Washington Monument and turned it into a cross.

 

The meltdown would be one for the ages.😂

 

BTW: Obelisks have no business in our Capitol. The people who put it there knew full well what they were doing… and it was never for what the public was told.

 

Our enemies within have been hard at work for a LONG time. Symbolism is incredibly important to them, so I want to see this happen.

______

"Obelisks have deep roots in ancient Egyptian religion and symbolism, which esoteric, occult, and later traditions (including Freemasonry and New Age practices) have reinterpreted and adopted." ~ Grok

 

9:54 PM · May 18, 2026·15.6K Views

https://x.com/i/status/2056554042739052561