Departing intelligence official blasts Washington Post article as 'hogwash,' says she supports Trump

Amaryllis Fox Kennedy said she's returning to the private sector to keep her "family financially on track," which aligns with emails she sent to colleagues explaining her reason for leaving as a top intelligence officer in the Trump administration.

maryllis Fox Kennedy, a departing top intelligence officer in the Trump administration and former CIA undercover officer, called a Washington Post article claiming she left her position over disputes with President Donald Trump's military involvement in Iran "hogwash."

"I stand with the President EVERY STEP OF THE WAY. And I will be at his side, serving on the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board and the Intelligence Oversight Board with pride, devotion, and deepest gratitude for the coming two and a half years," Kennedy, who is daughter-in-law of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., said in a scathing post on X responding to the article.

The Washington Post article cited an anonymous source claiming she left her position as deputy to director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbarb in part over her disagreement with Trump's military involvement in Iran.

The article goes on to share an email to colleagues, which the Post had obtained, stating that she was leaving to return to the private sector in order to focus on her family. The Post noted that the email praised Trump.

Kennedy's post on X reiterated that her departure had nothing to do with any disagreements with Trump. She said she's returning to the private sector to keep her "family financially on track." She has a daughter about to enter college, and two younger children to education, she said.

more:

https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/departing-intelligence-official-blasts-washington-post-article-hogwash-says

Turbo Cancer Onslaught: mRNA Vaccines – Genomic Saboteurs Igniting Malignancy

By John A. Catanzaro, as published by Decision Junction, Nicolas Hulscher and Peter A. McCullough on 23 January 2026

Transcriptomic and Encoding Chaos

For decades, I have decoded the chaos of oncogenic storms – transcriptomic upheavals where cells turn traitor overnight. At Neo7 Bioscience, our PBIMA and REViSS platforms reveal the unfiltered truth: raw sabotage of molecular machinery. Since the mRNA vaccine rollout in 2021, we have witnessed a tidal wave of genomic damage – not coincidence, but consequence. The claim that mRNA shots “cure” or “sensitise” cancer is false. They do not heal; they hijack. They do not strengthen immunity; they cripple it. This is not an accident. This is weaponised gene manipulation. mRNA vaccines are not medicine; they are mutagens – deliberate tools of genomic disruption masquerading as saviours. Here, I dismantle the recent Nature paper, ‘SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines sensitise tumours to immune checkpoint blockade’ – a flawed mirage of mouse models and biased data – while exposing irrefutable real-world evidence. The only solution:Total elimination of the mRNA platform. Partial measures won’t suffice. This technology must be eradicated to halt the turbo cancer plague.

Dismantling the Nature Facade: Desperation, Not Science

The Nature study claims mRNA vaccines “sensitise” tumours to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC and melanoma, citing doubled survival (HR 0.51, P<0.0001) in 884 lung cancer and 210 melanoma patients. These are retrospective analyses from MD Anderson, adjusted for confounders like stage and smoking. But scrutiny reveals fatal flaws:

Correlation, not causation: Immortal time bias persists despite “corrections.”

Irrelevant mouse models: B16F10 tumours shrink in rodents with spike-LNPs and anti-PD-1, but human immune responses differ vastly.

PD-L1 upregulation (24% higher TPS post-vax): This signals immune evasion, not sensitisation – tumours hiding from detection.

Critical omissions: No data on new cancers, long-term incidence, or pre-2021 unvaccinated baselines.

If mRNA vaccines were protective, why the 2024-2025 explosion of aggressive cancers in the young? Glioblastomas have surged 300%. This paper distracts from billions of doses and oncologists’ reports of “post-vaccine relapses.” It is wilful blindness propping up a defective platform that must be eradicated.

Frontline Evidence: Undeniable Signals of Weaponised Harm

more:

https://expose-news.com/2026/05/20/mrna-injections-must-be-banned/