"Trump" has now turned against both MTG and Lauren Bobert.
What do they have in common?
What does it mean?
Good execution, but fatally flawed idea.
If there were any evidence, even only slightly plausible evidence, that Trump had in any way abused minors, this would have been exposed and utilized by his enemies long ago.
(His observing that hot teenage models are actually hot does not count, and everyone actually knows that.)
>What do they have in common?
Actually, what I was insinuating was that MTG and Lauren Bobert QUITE SPECIFICALLY were derided by the legacy media as being QANON cultists.
And it does seem that they were in fact the first two members of Congress to cite "following Q" as a key motivation for running for office.