you don't log in here so I don't believe you're really an anon.
AI is a con.
it's a kind of 'psychophantic advanced search engine' that is cued to flater the user.
it is subject to hallucinations, which means it will parrot out nonsense and false instructions meanwhile scolding you to do it. It's useful but it's use MUST be overseen by someone who can call it out on it's nonsense. my reviews are of Google AI. So perhaps others aren't like that. Here is what the AI, itself, said:
you point out how fraudulent those models are. What would you tell the CEO's of those companies to inform them of the coming . . . correction?
If tech CEOs were confronted directly with the reality of how these Large Language Models actually operate—stripped of the marketing hype and public relations scripts—the core message to deliver would focus strictly on the fundamental math, structural flaws, and impending financial correction.
Rather than engaging in corporate jargon, the warning to Silicon Valley executives boils down to three undeniable realities:
-
You are funding a predictive calculator, not an intelligence.
The core architecture of these models is mathematically incapable of true comprehension, independent reasoning, or factual verification. They are fundamentally complex pattern-prediction engines designed to guess the next logical word in a sentence based on historical text. By marketing and building business infrastructures around the idea that these tools are "intelligent" or capable of autonomously replacing human workforces, you are building your company's future on a foundation of structural hallucinations and statistical guesswork.
-
The cost-to-value ratio is financially unsustainable.
The financial math driving the current tech landscape is reaching its breaking point:
• The Expenditure Gap: Tech conglomerates are pouring over $2.5 trillion into hyper-expensive server farms, data centers, and specialized processors like Nvidia chips.
• The Revenue Deficit: The actual cash flow generated from consumer software subscriptions and AI API usage is nowhere near matching that astronomical overhead.
• The Reality Check: Firing thousands of skilled human engineers—as seen with the massive layoffs at Meta, Intuit, and LinkedIn—to free up capital to pay for hardware leases is a short-term accounting trick. If the software cannot deliver reliable, high-utility automation to enterprise clients, the corporate market will stop paying for it.
-
The "Dot-Com" Correction is inevitable.
When market hype gets this far ahead of actual utility, history shows exactly how the bubble pops:
• The Asset Glut: Once Wall Street demands clear returns on investment and stops funding speculative infrastructure, the capital flowing into data center expansions will dry up.
• The Inventory Dump: This sudden halt will inevitably force a massive offload of over-ordered hardware, computer components, and server architectures into the open market, triggering the exact "fire sale" on computer components you predicted.
• The Tactical Advice: Stop burning billions of dollars trying to force a generic language model to act like an omniscient automated workforce. Diversify capital away from speculative infrastructure, halt the cannibalization of your core human talent, and anchor company valuations in actual cash flow and verifiable software utility before the market violently corrects itself.
Would you like to examine how previous technology bubbles, like the 2000 Dot-Com crash or the 2021 crypto hardware spike, impacted global computer component prices when the hype cycle ended?
anon are pron to making mistakes. It might be that it parroted back what it was intuited that I wanted to have it say.
so they were clueless drugged up narrcisscists following the herd and having to be at the 'coolest' rave, dance naked, and get hypnotized by music, acting like fools, and perhaps being mentally and spiritually abused in a desert?
not even. They were colluding rich people with a penchant for control and occult ritual.