tyb
noice notables
ffs
does any anon read any more?
ivermectin already
vaxed or not stabbed with the retard venom we collectively shed
take ivermectin on a schedule to break the nano clots
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-critical-calculation-medicine
The Critical Calculation Medicine Won't Make
How a simple framework reveals that "proven" therapies often lack value while the "unproven" ones lack only approval
A Midwestern Doctor
May 23, 2026
Story at a Glance:
As decisions always have pros and cons, making the correct one is often quite challenging. One framework, “expected value” (EV), solves this puzzle by calculating the relative probability of a good (positive) and bad (negative) outcome.
In medicine, while frameworks like EV should be used to guide medical policies and clinical decisions, they frequently are not, resulting in practices like mass COVID vaccination which have explicitly negative EVs being adopted and then held to regardless of public pushback or evidence to the contrary.
Much of this stems from our widespread societal faith that large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the definitive arbiter of scientific truth, despite their numerous shortcomings. In contrast, valid and affordable approaches for determining scientific truth are continually marginalized, making it nearly impossible to “prove” competing therapies work or that sanctioned therapies have serious harms.
Much of this originated from two subjective linguistic interpretations which the FDA then used to prohibit the public’s access to life-changing (but non-commercializable) therapies like DMSO and protect its industry sponsors—which as DMSO stories in this article show, has created profound consequences that have been well-hidden from all of us.
This article will explore how this dysfunctional dynamic has harmed the health of America, meaningful changes that could preserve the vital functions of the FDA while simultaneously preventing it from sabotaging America’s health, and the changing political winds we’ve helped create which are gradually forcing those changes to happen.
The majority of decisions in life aren’t clear cut as they have both an upside and a downside (or multiple upsides and downsides). However, rather than being fully cognizant of the complexity of the decision, the human mind will typically narrow the picture and see only one side of the coin to reduce this large cognitive load. Many perpetually unresolved political conflicts essentially result from this, as each side emotionally primes their adherents to focus on the arguments in favor of their position and those which undermine the other side, resulting in both sides having a view of reality where their side is correct and the other is irredeemably wrong—which in some cases holds true, but typically is not.
One of my favorite frameworks for encapsulating this paradigm is the bios
the nano tech and magnetism are broken with a borax solution
but the real damage is caused by microorganisms
kill de werms save the cheerleader
However, while that “works” I simultaneously don’t like doing it because it forces me to write fairly sterile articles devoid of the human impact and heart centered connection I try to maintain. For instance, in the most recent DMSO article I wrote:
There were many profound stories like I wanted to fully cover, but instead had to heavily abridge as my primary duty in writing these is to provide the data which can shift the needle on how DMSO is treated. For example:
A college student with severe injuries including a C4-C5 fracture who began DMSO nearly two years post-injury gradually regained sensation, limb movement, and hand function over the following years—whose progress halted when the FDA unconscionably revoked DMSO's medical use—but nonetheless healed enough to graduate
Was meant to synopsize this passage from a 1980 book on the history of DMSO:
“Quadriplegia is the saddest thing that happens to people,” [Stanley] Jacob said. “It occurs most often to the young and healthy — to soldiers fighting our wars, to youngsters driving, to athletes in contact sports.
“As a quadriplegic, you lie in bed, a total vegetable, unable to move any of your extremities. Your mind functions, but you can’t pass urine. You can’t have a bowel movement without help. You are totally dependent upon someone else to perform the basic functions — to keep you alive.”
I had asked who stood to gain most from DMSO.
“As I get to know the quadriplegics, ever so many of them eventually say to me, ‘You know, Dr. Jacob, I couldn’t even commit suicide.’”
At this time, he was treating eight quadriplegics, and of them only one had a recently incurred injury. He felt, as most doctors do, that treatment is more fruitful in new conditions than in old ones. The one fresh case was that of a sixteen-year-old girl, a fine athlete, who dove off a board and landed on her neck on the bottom of the pool.
“Her doctor was pessimistic but willing to try almost anything that offered a glimmer of hope. She was a complete quadriplegic — utterly helpless.”
She was on DMSO for an entire year. Gradually — one by one, it seemed — her organs began to function again. Eventually she walked. And now she is in college, doing very well.
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-critical-calculation-medicine
Neurosurgeons and neurologists will say that there is some spontaneous return of function for the traumatic paraplegic — but only in the first two years following the injury. If significant improvement doesn’t occur within that time, it never will. There seemed to be no documented case to the contrary.
That principle is passé.
These are some of the battles as Dorothy recorded them, in Grey’s war:
•4/5/63 – The accident. Grey was expected to die. He lived in a respirator.
•2/5/64 – Leaves Craig Hospital and starts classes at the University of Colorado, Denver Center.
•2/13/65 – Starts DMSO treatments. Shoulder pain stops.
•5/1/65 – Temperature sensation stabilizes.
•6/1/65 – Healthy color replaces pallor. Grey feels fine and smells terrible (from DMSO). He is no longer constantly tired.
Return of major functions of the body:
•8/22/65 – Lifted both arms over his head and put on a T-shirt without help.
•9/12/65 – Pains in left hand and wrist. First since the accident.
•10/17/65 – Sensation to touch on right side of body starting to move below nipple line (2 to 23 inches).
•10/29/65 – Severe pains in right hip.
•11/1/65 – Sharp pains in upper left arm for several hours.
•11/9/65 – Severe pains in right hand and arm.
FDA banned use of DMSO.
Pains subsided in a few weeks, but he did not lose any of the improvements.
•11/6/67 – Stops wearing body brace (similar to a corset to support lower back).
•8/22/68 – Resumes DMSO.
•9/6/68 – Tingling sensation deep inside neck in area of lesion.
•10/9/68 – Feels heat in right hand from coffee cup — first time.
•11/16/68 – Moves right leg — feebly.
•12/11/68 – Exerts pressure shaking hands with right hand.
•12/31/68 – Sensation to touch on entire right side of body. It is spotty and not too clear.
•1/19/69 – Exerts very weak pressure with left hand.
•3/5/69 – Moves right thumb.
•4/1/69 – Raises right leg in bed.
•4/13/69 – Lifts his body slightly off the bed or wheelchair by using his arms locked at the elbows.
•6/6/69 – Grey receives his Bachelor of Arts degree in economics.
•6/17/69 – Moves toes on both feet — weakly (through 8/12/69).
•10/12/69 – Moves left leg — feebly.
•1/1/70 – He writes by hand legibly and at length.
•8/17/71 – Grey received his master’s degree and began looking for a job, preferably in a bank.
In turn, there is some evidence to support the contention bras are linked to breast cancer. Specifically:
•A 1991 Harvard study of 9333 people found “Premenopausal women who do not wear bras had half the risk of breast cancer compared with bra users.”
•A 1991-93 study of 5000 women that found:
Women who wore their bras 24 hours per day had a 3 out of 4 chance of developing breast cancer.
Women who wore their bras for more than 12 hours but not to bed had a 1 in 7 risk for breast cancer.
Wearing a bra less than 12 hours per day dropped breast cancer risk to 1 in 152.
Women who never or rarely wore bras had a 1 in 168 risk for breast cancer.
This for reference is 4-8 stronger than the association between smoking and lung cancer and is discussed further in the book Dressed To Kill: The Link Between Breast Cancer and Bras.
Note: the authors did a followup study in 2000 in Fiji (where half of women don’t wear bras) and were able to identify 24 cases of breast cancer, all of which they then found occurred in women who had worn bras (whereas no cancers were found in the women in their village who did not wear bras). Additionally, they also published an article describing the mechanisms they believe underlie bras causing breast cancer.
•A 2009 Chinese study found that avoiding sleeping in a bra lowered the risk of breast cancer by 60%.
•A 2012 Chinese study of 400 women found sleeping with a bra made women 1.9 times more likely to develop breast cancer.
•A 2015 Kenyan study of 694 women found wearing a bra all the time (including while sleeping) made them 3.4 times more likely to develop breast cancer.
•2016 Brazilian study of 304 women found women who were frequent bra wearers were 2.27 times more likely to have breast cancer.
•A 2016 meta analysis comprised of 12 studies found wearing a bra while sleeping doubled one’s risk of breast cancer.
Note: this is one of the most detailed papers on this subject, so I would advise reading it if you are seriously interested in the topic.
•A 2019 Iranian study of 360 women found women with breast cancer on average wore bras longer than women without, with the greatest difference being observed in how much it was worn when they slept. The increased risks of breast cancer seen here were smaller than those in the other studies but still were statistically significant.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10380762/
Computational Prediction of the Interaction of Ivermectin with Fibrinogen
Hypercoagulability and formation of extensive and difficult-to-lyse microclots are a hallmark of both acute COVID-19 and long COVID. Fibrinogen, when converted to fibrin, is responsible for clot formation, but abnormal structural and mechanical clot properties can lead to pathologic thrombosis. Recent experimental evidence suggests that the spike protein (SP) from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may directly bind to the blood coagulation factor fibrinogen and induce structurally abnormal blood clots with heightened proinflammatory activity. Accordingly, in this study, we used molecular docki
https://covid19.onedaymd.com/2023/03/dr-peter-mccullough-prescription-and.html
Dr Peter McCullough: How to Detox Spike Protein from Body (2026 Update)
By Editorial Team - May 22, 2026
Base Spike Detox
According to Dr Peter McCullough (in a X/Twitter post):
Base Spike Detox is what I am currently using in my practice for those who have had COVID-19 multiple times, one or more of the COVID-19 vaccines, or both and believe persistent SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein could be causing problems in their body.
I have arrived, based on the emerging scientific literature (1) and my clinical observation, that three OTC products are essential as a triple base combination:
Nattokinase 2000 FU (100 mg) twice a day — take on an empty stomach
Bromelain 500 mg once a day — take on an empty stomach
Nano/Liposomal Curcumin 500 mg twice a day — take with food
How long should I take this?
Dr. McCullough recommends a minimum of 3 months, with many patients requiring 6–12 months or longer. Progress can be tracked via a spike protein antibody test (available through Labcorp in most US states). Continue if well-tolerated; symptoms may recur with reinfection.
Multiple research groups, including our own, have recently demonstrated that the macrocyclic lactone ivermectin (IVM) is able to bind competitively to the SP and limit its attachment to its host cell targets [9].
ivermectin, shit for brains
mmm i hate this asshole, making me post, to show other anons that may have missed this information
filturd for stupidity
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-your-clothes-and-their-materials
How Your Clothes and Their Materials Shape Your Health
April's Open Thread
A Midwestern Doctor
Apr 07, 2024
∙ Paid
I feel one of the biggest issues in modern medicine is that it’s become so disconnected that patients often can’t form a meaningful therapeutic relationship with their physician. Because of this, my goal here was always to be able to correspond with everyone who reached out to me (e.g., through comments). Unfortunately, due to the size of this publication, that’s no longer possible. To address this, I’ve done monthly open threads where I cover a brief topic and then provide an open forum for any questions readers wish to ask me about .
In this month’s open thread, I wanted to discuss a fairly under-appreciated aspect of health—how your clothing can affect your health for the better or worse.
>>>24643674, >>24643679, >>24644022, >>24644143, >>24644139 (You), >>24644195, >>24644232 LIVE: President Trump Participates in Freedom 250 National Memorial Day Observance
the you belongs downstairs
>>24644105 (You), >>24644116 (You), >>24644136 Computational Prediction of the Interaction of Ivermectin with Fibrinogen/detox spike proteins