>>2464379 (lb)

Thanks, just wondering …. as there could be a reason, with the clock being "two days slow".

If that were to be interpreted this way, then Apr 26 would be out of the time frame, while 12/09 would be inside with the stringer posted 12/07.

Sorry to hear about your device "coincidently" breaking.

>>2464498

>>2464552

If someone has the data (or a link to/copy of it – not the image, but the actual data, parseable), then it wouldn't be to hard to make a map