>>2464260

^^^^^^^^

>>2464601

>>2464260

^^^^^^^

So now everyone is sad the Scott Adams says "Q is not real."

Please take note of the fact Scott on his Periscope how he expressed how worried he is because he feels it upsets his 'brand' as a Trump Suppoerted.

((((Muh Brand.))))

So now everyone is sad that Scott Adams says "Q is not real."

Please take note of the fact how Scott went out of his way on his Periscope to express how worried HE is because he feels it upsets his 'brand' as a Trump Supporter.

((((Muh Brand.))))

Notice how NO ONE in media is attacking any of the information Q provides. I doubt any of them have read one post….not ONE.

Questions for Scott Adams:

1) If Q is not real, is he AI?

2) Since you say Q is not real, then who or what is he/she/they or it?

3) Where does Q get the information he/she/they or it provides?

4) For a dude who prides himself on 'logic', why do you get emotional about your (((brand))) as a reason for "Q is not real"?

Scott Adams in a nutshell.

I don't believe in Q, but I do believe in my convoluted and circular logic arguments explaining what you perceive is every secret chess move and master stroke of genius strategy by POTUS.

Can't have it both ways Scotty. lol

Scott Adams in a nutshell.

I don't believe in Q, but I do believe in my convoluted and circular logic arguments explaining what I (Scott) perceive as every secret chess move and master stroke of genius strategy by POTUS.

Can't have it both ways Scotty. lol