>>2463913 (lb)
>>2463669 (lb)
>>2463964 (lb)
I posted this yesterday RE: Wray, RR, & Q#1812
[RR] Failure to comply with congressional requests and subpoenas? + [RR] Hiding information from Congress?
Let's think logically.
PREMISE:
Rod Rosenstein is fulfilling the obligation of his OATH in such defiance. He is hiding information from a congress in which sitting members are implicated by the Mueller special counsel which he oversees.
Above all else they must protect the integrity of the investigation, as it involves top players and so for now whatever information withheld is most likely critical within the context of the investigation(s).
If he were to comply with these requests and/or subpoenas in totality he would essentially be revealing evidence to the very perpetrators that it implicates.
According to "media reports" (fake news folks) he threatened staff on the House Intel Committee. I wonder why? Could this be in some way construed as part of his duties? <need to locate specific details here
Conservatives pretend to have [RR] in their proverbial sights/target box. This is a CHARADE in order to inspire trust and confidence in Rosenstein from Dems/Fake News as they predictably seek negation to POTUS/Allies. This leverages narrative control for Q/POTUS because it places Rod Rosenstein under the favor/protection of the MSM.
What happens when the two people the Cabal placed all of their chips on end up being the very two people to bring them to the light of Justice?
(((Their))) house of cards comes tumbling down.
You see, Rod Rosenstein doesn't need to offer anything more than a substantive explanation that the MSM considers satisfactory. He's working for the side thats criticizing him while being spun by the media (as consequence of their negation towards POTUS) as their own hero, when really, he is the hammer that will drop on them. A sheep in wolfs clothing.
Would POTUS keep these guys around if they weren't doing something he liked?
THINK LOGICALLY.
Their use of the word OATH is to signify that they are on the side of Q/POTUS/Patriots/Anons etc.
Logic follows as such:
1 - Think WRAY – (1 = past) "TRUST WRAY"
2 - Think [RR] – (2 = future)
Now: Think connection.
"OATH" is the connection.
1=2.
TRUST WRAY (past) == TRUST [RR] (future)
However I'm beginning to think now that perhaps the entire [RR] + mueller SC is a misdirect from what Wray's task force has been doing.
Also possible: they are all working together. Something here for sure.