‘Nightmare for Israel’: Senior GOP senators criticize alleged terms of emerging Iran deal
After Iran says nuclear issues aren’t part of current talks, former secretary of state Mike Pompeo compares terms to 2015 Iran deal, says it will let Tehran ‘terrorize the world’
Senior US senators from the Republican Party voiced criticism on Saturday over the reported terms of the deal that US President Donald Trump is negotiating with Tehran to end the Iran war.
The emerging criticism from within Trump’s own party comes after US and Iranian officials both signalled that they were nearing an agreement on a memorandum of understanding to end the war and set the stage for further talks.
Trump specified that the agreement would include opening the Strait of Hormuz, but did not mention Iran’s nuclear program, despite repeatedly insisting that Iran would not be allowed to attain nuclear weapons and that the regime must relinquish its stockpile of 60 percent-enriched uranium.
Iran, meanwhile, said that nuclear issues were not part of the current negotiations.
Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a vocal supporter of the war against Iran unleashed by the US and Israel on February 28 and the chair of the Senate Budget Committee, expressed fear over terms that would allow the Iranian regime to survive, saying a deal that leaves Iran in a strong position in the region would lead to a “nightmare for Israel.”
“If a deal is struck to end the Iranian conflict because it is believed that the Strait of Hormuz cannot be protected from Iranian terrorism and Iran still possesses the capability to destroy major Gulf oil infrastructure, then Iran will be perceived as being a dominate [sic] force requiring a diplomatic solution,” he posted on X.
“This combination of Iran being perceived as having the ability to terrorize the Strait in perpetuity and the ability [to] inflict massive damage to Gulf oil infrastructure is a major shift of the balance of power in the region and over time will be a nightmare for Israel,” he added.
The X account belonging to the Senate Republicans shared Graham’s post, as did Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, warned separately that “the rumored 60-day ceasefire — with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith — would be a disaster.”
“Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!,” he added, referring to the war with Iran by Washington’s name for it.
Neither Graham nor Wicker mentioned Trump by name in their posts.
Wicker, on Friday, blamed Trump’s advisers for pushing him to make a deal with Iran “that would not be worth the paper it is written on” rather than allowing the president to “finish the job he started.”
“Further pursuit of an agreement with Iran’s Islamist regime risks a perception of weakness,” he said.
Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas added his voice to the growing chorus of condemnation on Sunday morning, saying he was “deeply concerned” by reports detailing the emerging deal.
“President Trump’s decision to strike Iran was the most consequential decision of his second term. He was right to do so, and we achieved extraordinary military results,” Cruz wrote on X. “If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant ‘death to America’—now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake.”
Unlike Graham and Wicker, Cruz named Trump in his post, but still appeared to try to distance the president from the potential deal, saying instead that it was being “pushed by some voices in the administration.”
“President Trump believes in peace through strength, and his strong leadership has already made America much safer. He should continue to hold the line, defend America & enforce the red lines he has repeatedly drawn,” he concluded.
Similarly, former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, who served under Trump during his first term, warned that the reported terms of the deal were “not remotely America First.”
Instead, Pompeo likened the emerging deal to the Obama administration’s 2015 Iran nuclear deal, saying it seemed “straight out of the Wendy Sherman-Robert Malley-Ben Rhodes playbook: Pay the IRGC to build a WMD program and terrorize the world.”
“Not remotely America First,” he said. “It’s straightforward: Open the damned strait. Deny Iran access to money. Take out enough Iranian capability so it cannot threaten our allies in the region.”
“Overdue,” he added. “Let’s go.”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/nightmare-for-israel-senior-gop-senators-criticize-alleged-terms-of-emerging-iran-deal/