The EU’s Ukraine gamble enters a dangerous new phase 1/2

The fate of the Ukraine conflict, part 3: The EU’s Russia strategy is built on borrowed time

Published 25 May, 2026 13:16

(I keep wondering why the Kremlin are publishing this for all of Europe to read, I suspect they have different plans, but they will hold the top powerful spot.)

Last year can be seen as the year in which the united anti-Russian coalition fell apart. In essence, there arenow three players acting against Russia (Ukraine, Europe, and the US), and each has its own interests. Sergey Poletaev has prepared a series of articles in which we analyze the position of each player and its goals and interests in the conflict, and suggest how Russia might respond.

In this piece,we focus on the European Union. Read the first part about Ukraine here and the second one about the US.

Let’s just go to war

Throughout last year, theliberal Western European coalition took over from the USand assumed the role ofboth instigator and orchestrator of a proxy conflict with Russia. Initially,they hoped that Donald Trump would force Vladimir Putin to agree to ceasefire termsacceptable to them, after which it would be possible torearm the Ukrainian military, deploy their own troops and, generally speaking,draw Ukraine into their military-political and economic sphere without undue military risks. In other words, to continue doing what had.originally been the goal of the EU and USand which, in fact,had been the cause of what Russia calls the “Special Military Operation.”

These plans were buried in Anchorage. In essence, it was there that Trump abandoned attempts to impose Western Europe’s terms on Putin. At the same time, Kiev was able to convince its new masters that it was capable of fighting for at least another two or three years. Thus, the current plan was born: Western Europe gives Kiev money for the war, buys weapons from the US, sets up its own production of long-range strike drones, tightens the sanctions regime, and continues the conflict as it is, trading Ukrainians for time.

Theassumptionis thatafter a couple of years of such a war, Russia will be sufficiently weakened. to allow their terms tobe dictated to Moscow. The mounting problems in the Russian economy seemed to lend credence to this scenario, whilst the neophyte enthusiasm with which the new strategists threw themselves into the fray left no other options.In a sense, the situation of 2022 is repeating itself, when few in the West or Ukraine had any doubts about Russia’s imminent and inevitable defeat.

So, the goals have been set, the tasks defined. The question of funding has been resolved, doubts within their own ranks have been quelled, and work is in full swing.Until this wave of enthusiasm subsides, no meaningful negotiations with Western European countries are possible.

The EU’s strengths lie in its economy, which is vast compared to Russia’s, and a higher-than-expected degree of political consolidation.Consequently, they can finance Ukraine with ease, slotting tens of billions in unplanned expenditure into budget tables, so seamlessly that it isdifficult to trace the path of the money.

Their weakness lies in the fact that they are prepared to wage war against Russia only through the exhausted Ukrainian army, which is on the.brink of collapse, and only from Ukrainian territory. It is commonly believed among Russian experts thatWestern Europe is actively preparing for a direct military confrontation with Moscow, but this is hardly the case. All the current hysterical, aggressive rhetoric is,rather, a defensive reaction, a consequence of fear and uncertainty. Theystill refuse to believe that the US would not defend themif push came to shove. And they are very reluctant to find themselves face to face with Russia.

https://www.rt.com/russia/640534-eus-ukraine-gamble/

>>24645786

2/2

Hence the gap between rhetoric and actual actions. In practice,Western European states are avoiding major provocations and constantly backing down: the Belgian government flatly refused to confiscate frozen Russian assets, and no one has been able to persuade them otherwise. Poland and Romania are turning a blind eye to Russian drones allegedly flying into their airspace, according to their own statements.Despite their menacing rhetoric, the Baltic states are actually the quietest of all; for the sake of their own peace of mind, they had to make a fuss with Kiev about the drones that had flown into their territory.The UK is forced to let hundreds of tankers from a supposed Russian ‘Shadow Fleet’ pass by its shores. There are plenty more examples.

A necklace of wartime anxieties

Russia, for its part, is attempting to establish rules of engagement with the EU basedon the same principles as those it established with the US under Joe Biden, andsubsequently under Trump. First and foremost,this means isolating the conflict within Ukraine. Since the entire strategy of the Western European coalition is based on theassumption that the Ukrainian military will be able to hold. the front line for an indefinite period,Moscow’s logic dictates that this is precisely where the blow must be struck, and it is the front line that must be broken. Western Europe has no other such instrument at its disposal, nor is one in sight.

The second objective is to force Ukraine’s European rear to take full account of Russian nuclear weaponsand to take the corresponding threats seriously. Moscow will likely continue to stage targeted military alerts directed at specific countries with the aim of steering their policies in the desired direction andinstilling in the EU ruling class reflexes they have never possessed. The incident involving the Baltic states can be seen as a trial run.

Moscow’s aim is to bring relations with Western Europe into a relatively stable state of Cold War. This cannot be achieved easily; it will require navigating a series of crises of varying intensity, including, in all likelihood, nuclear ones.

Russia’s advantage lies in its ability to threaten specific countries in response to specific actions,in accordance with the ‘divide and rule’ principle. Suppose the German navy attempts to blockade Kaliningrad. In response,Russia threatens to strike naval bases on German territory. It makes this threat in such a way that there is no doubt:if the blockade is not lifted within 24 hours, the strike will be carried out.What would French President Emmanuel Macron do in such a case? Would he throw himself into the fray, risking becoming a target himself?

The fact that Trump will remain on the sidelines is already taken for granted in Europe. But it is highly likely that the Baltic states will not participate in such a blockade either.

If we extend this line of thinking into the future,a distinct Russian principle of non-interference emerges, a sort of Russian-style Monroe Doctrine: the territories of Ukraine and Belarus (and, in a second phase, the Baltic states, Moldova, and the South Caucasus)are declared off-limits to hostile actions by third countries. This does not mean that every little provocation will be followed by a nuclear strike on London or Berlin,but it does mean that specific actions by specific European governmentswill have consequences for them, including military ones, and they will have to take this into account when making any decisions.

***

Despite the fact that Western Europe is not seeking direct conflict with Russia, it is prepared to participate in the proxy war in Ukraine with complete dedication. A major deal, a new security architecture with the countries of Europe, is impossible as long as the current political class remains in power there, a class that places supranational interests above national ones. And for the time being, they are wide-eyed with fear of the Russian bear.

We should expect Russia to continue playing on EU fears, orchestrating military alarms, and seeking to instill in them the reflexes Moscow requires. Since neither Russia nor the other major European countries wish to attack one another, there is a chance of reducing the confrontation to a Cold War with more or less predictable rules.

https://www.rt.com/russia/640534-eus-ukraine-gamble/

Navy Veteran: "We're One Generation From Going Extinct" | Official Preview

Shawn Ryan Show

In this episode of the Shawn Ryan Show,two-time USA Memory Champion and Navy veteran Ron White breaks down the memory systems that helped him memorize thousands of names of American service members killed in Afghanistan, including how he uses the Mind Palace technique, visualization, and structured recall. Ron shares his path from a struggling young entrepreneur selling memory seminars to serving in Naval Intelligence after 9/11, while also discussing speed reading, remembering names, improving focus, TBI-related memory challenges, grief after the loss of his family, andwhy honoring Gold Star families remains central to his mission.

5:57

https://youtu.be/FQV__DTEVGM

Russia warns all foreign citizens to leave Kiev

Moscow has urged foreigners to leave the Ukrainian capital and warned residents to stay away from military, industrial and government sites

Published 25 May, 2026 13:56

Kiev’s deadly attack on a college dorm in the Russian town of Starobelsk last week was the “last straw” for Russia, and it will be conducting “systematic strikes” on assorted targets across the Ukrainian capital from now on, the Foreign Ministry in Moscow has announced.

The ministry made the statement on Monday, a day after a large-scale retaliatory strike on Kiev, prompted by the drone attack on the college in the Lugansk People’s Republic. The Ukrainian strike killed at least 21 people in their dormitory, mainly teenage girls.

The Starobelsk attack has become yet another testament to “the Nazi and terrorist nature of the Kiev regime, which deliberately targets civilians and does not hesitate to murder children in cold blood,” the ministry said, warning that Moscow is shifting its approach to the Ukraine conflict.

“This was the last straw. Under these circumstances, the Russian Armed Forces will be launching systematic strikes against the Ukrainian military-industrial complex in Kiev, including locations where UAVs are designed, manufactured, programmed, and prepared for use,” the ministry said, adding that the campaign will also affect “decision-making centers and command posts.”

The designated targets are spread all over Kiev, the ministry noted, urging foreign nationals, including diplomats and representatives of international organizations, to leave the Ukrainian capital immediately. It also warned the city’s residents to stay away from the “military and administrative infrastructure facilities of the Zelensky regime.”

The Foreign Ministry issued a similar warning earlier this month, when Russia threatened a large-scale strike on Kiev in response to its threats to attack the Victory Day celebrations in Moscow. An evacuation notice was formally sent to all foreign missions and international organizations accredited in Russia, urging them to leave the Ukrainian capital.

The demand was openly snubbed by some Western nations, with German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul stating that Berlin would not be “intimidated” by it.A similar stance was communicated by the EU Commission, which said it “will not change our posture or presence” in Kiev. The potential exchange in such strikes, however, never occurred, as the warring sides ultimately managed to enter an uneasy truce amid the celebrations.

https://www.rt.com/russia/640543-russia-prepares-to-launch-systematic/