Dunno Anon, depends on the instrument and where you let them put it. kek
Tell you what anon, go join your butt buddies Massie and Green down in Costa Rica; take the rest of your Rino shills with you.
Between MSM, Rinos, corrupt judges, Dumocrats, and just plain ignorant people with TDS getting things done isn't an easy lift. Every thing on your list has been given attention but when something is exposed someone jumps in to throw a cog in the gears turning.
Anon can't sauce it but a few months ago anon was reading articles about WW1 and things leading up to it. A couple of those articles was talking about the potential of Jewish people being targeted for persecution and harm. Anon finds it ironic the number they were using in the 1917-1920 era was…6 million. 25-30 years later them world decides 6 million Jews were killed in the holocaust? Coincidence?
(Me) I posed this to Copilot and this is what I got:
"The short answer: yes, it’s a coincidence — and it’s also completely explainable once you understand the historical context.
The “6 million” figure did not originate in 1917–1920 predictions. It originated from post‑war demographic analysis, not from earlier rhetoric. But earlier rhetoric did sometimes use large round numbers — including “six million” — for reasons that are easy to understand once you see the pattern.
Let me break it down clearly and factually, because this topic gets twisted a lot online.
🧩 1. Why “six million” appears before WWII
Before WWII, Jewish organizations, newspapers, and relief groups often warned about mass starvation, pogroms, and displacement of Jews in Eastern Europe — especially during:
WWI
The Russian Civil War
Pogroms in Ukraine and Poland
Famine and disease outbreaks
These crises affected millions of Jews. When activists tried to raise money or attention, they often used large round numbers to describe the entire Jewish population at risk in a region.
That’s why you sometimes see phrases like:
“Six million Jews in Eastern Europe face starvation”
“Six million Jews are in peril”
These were not claims of deaths, just rhetorical descriptions of the size of the population suffering hardship.
It’s similar to how someone today might say:
“Millions of children are at risk of famine in region X.”
It’s not a prediction of a specific future death toll — it’s a way of describing the scale of a humanitarian crisis.
🧩 2. So where does the Holocaust’s “six million” come from?
The Holocaust figure comes from post‑war demographic studies, not from pre‑war rhetoric.
After WWII, researchers compared:
pre‑war Jewish population estimates
post‑war census data
Nazi records
immigration records
survivor counts
Independent scholars, governments, and Jewish organizations all arrived at roughly the same number: about 5.7–6.3 million Jews murdered.
This number is not based on slogans or earlier articles — it’s based on population accounting, the same method used to estimate casualties in any large-scale conflict.
🧩 3. Why the coincidence feels eerie
It feels strange because the same number appears in two different contexts:
Pre‑WWII: “Six million Jews are suffering / at risk”
Post‑WWII: “Six million Jews were murdered”
But the reason is simple:
Eastern Europe’s Jewish population was about 6 million before WWII.
Relief groups used that number rhetorically.
The Nazis murdered the majority of that same population.
So the overlap isn’t mysterious — it’s demographic reality.
🧩 4. What this is not
It is not evidence of:
a conspiracy
a pre-planned narrative
a predetermined number
Those claims come from Holocaust denial circles, which intentionally blur the difference between:
population at risk (pre‑WWII)
population murdered (post‑WWII)
The similarity in numbers is simply because the same population was being discussed."