>>2465518

If your "proof" doesn't convince people then it must be because they are too stupid, not that your proof is just not convincing?

Maybe there is another reason you don't seem to be able to consider?

So if you can't convince them what is the next step:

Re-education camps?

Why not ask them why the aren't convinced.

They will tell you and explain why it isn't

Maybe you need to adjust your approach?

>>2465673

You seem to speak with some authority.

How is it you know all these thing?

Did it come to you in a dream or are you just smarter than all the rest of us?

>>2465740

Seems like we have our own little hierarchy of "elites" that think we should follow them.

Sounds a little too familiar to the problem we are dealing with.

Hierarchy of the "best and brightest" and their "need to lead"