>>2465941 (pb)

Unfortunately, most people have been trained to equate academic excellence with the ability to take the facts that they learn from some "authority" and then internalize those facts. They are encouraged to write essays in which they may come to somewhat divergent conclusions which gives the illusion of independent thought. The "authority" however, requires that the students stick to certain sources and the "authority" will fail them if they deviate too far from certain norms in terms of sourcing or thought process.

Not everyone is fully up to speed on the "independent thought" and "independent sourcing" concepts, even though that is what Q absolutely encourages. There are also multitudes of class clowns who pretend to be anons, but who's posts are designed to interrupt the research that goes on here in any way possible. They are mostly the ones who discourage other anons from questioning consensus ideas. They are in-turn fed by other clowns who purposefully "question" conclusions that are very well-sourced and well-established.

Don't worry so much about what other anons posts if it seems fishy to you. Don't concern-fag. Don't concern-troll. Don't concern-shill. It's a waste of time, no matter your intention.