Anonymous ID: 481e37 Aug. 5, 2018, 11:43 a.m. No.2466593   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6607

I want to remind everyone of something in re: to Q's latest post.

>>2465633

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2465154.html#2465633

I like to re-read crumbs that might correlate, and one of the most important crumbs, that spawned a discussion on Civic Nationalism, came from this Q post:

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1161667.html#1162020

>IT’S TIME TO UNITE AND FIGHT FOR OUR FREEDOM.

>TOGETHER, we are STRONG.

>APART, we are weak.

>PATRIOTS HAVE NO SKIN COLOR.

 

Particularly, the first sentence quoted above stands out to me:

>IT’S TIME TO UNITE AND FIGHT FOR OUR FREEDOM.

Freedom from whom? Q knows. There are anons here that know, but it's not one of those things we go "all out" to point out for fear of certain labels that come from discussing it. This is going to be a hard pill for many to swallow because to point it out makes you seem racist. But simply stating observable facts should not land you the label of bigot, right? We anons need to tread lightly on this. Sit back, be patient, and observe/draw correlations with a heart of discernment; not hate. Enough of that, though. It's the remainder of this crumb that has my noggin joggin' in relation to Q's post:

>TOGETHER, we are STRONG.

>APART, we are weak.

>PATRIOTS HAVE NO SKIN COLOR.

Fighting for our cause, the patriotic American cause, doesn't come with a racial pre-qualifier. We all need to work together to get past this time in our history were some of our ideological divisions are still based on skin color. No, Q isn't advocating everyone pick someone of a different race to make a family with. No, Q is not advocating hating your heritage in favor of someone else's. What Q is pointing out is that we each have something unique to our backgrounds that we can bring to the ideological arsenal of patriotism to our great Republic.

 

This patriotic ideology is our uniting cause; working in contrast to divisive identity politics

 

Being patriotic is, sometimes, putting your nation ahead of yourself. Selfless devotion to the cause of your nation is something that most would leave up to those enlisted in military service. Civilians have had to answer that call, too, in the past. Q wants us to understand how the enemy has used our identities to force a wedge of division in us all; going back all the way to Lincoln, and even before!

 

POTUS' tweets might be agreeable, but it was Hillary that took the bait this time. So many are now here and observing what's going on. Hillary may think that she got the moral high ground with her quip, but her response is a placating one, and now the entire world knows it! Look at Q's post. It's in line with Q's previous post about this same subject. We know for an absolute FACT what type of woman Hillary is. We know for an absolute FACT that she only sees the black community as a voting block that she (and her party) HAVE to control.

 

What do we know about POTUS' relationship with blacks? Think MJ. Think Dragon Energy. Think Kara Young! One of these two are definitely a racist. One of them; definitely NOT.