Is Anon not free to chose not to read dumb b s post? Free speech doesn't supersede ones right of freedom not to listen.
Glad to see Anon is good at self analysis.
Anon was born with inalienable rights given by his creator; that means I may do as I damn well please. That includes clicking the arrow and putting a filter on someone who continues to post annoying b s. If Anon wants their post read it is up to them to post things that are not annoying. They too are free to post whatever they like but this Anon doesn't like to be distracted with b s.
Other Anon's (You) mind might be too full of shit to realize we are both free to exercise our freedoms.
I don't disagree at all. My human nature says smash an offender's face when I'm offended. My inner spirit has sought a different path, I reasoned once, other Anon was insulted and chirped back; I stood my ground and committed the forbidden action Anon was insisting was a crime. I filtered Anon because I don't like reading annoying b s.
Is that a sin before my Creator, I think not.