>>24666348 you are correct sir
Funny how it never came up in the hearing.
How could anyone rape a "woman" who is not one at all?
It doesn't have the necessary parts to make it even possible.
That would have been hilarious if it came out at trial.
>>24666348 you are correct sir
Funny how it never came up in the hearing.
How could anyone rape a "woman" who is not one at all?
It doesn't have the necessary parts to make it even possible.
That would have been hilarious if it came out at trial.