Most of the intelligence network tied to the Transnational Crime Syndicate that was running the Executive Branch from The Shadows until just the last 15 months set up numerous slush funds inside of our government over the past 50 years.

Many of the slush fund/theft/money laundering shenanigans were going on at FHFA, via Fannie and Freddie.

While most of the attention was focused like a laser on USAid, Pulte was quietly taking some the BIGGEST slush funds away from the cabal at FHFA.

He just spent the last year with the help of AI investigators tracing the fraud money, shutting down the fraud, mapping out the criminal networks.

Nobody is better at setting up false front LLCs to facilitate shady criminal off-the-books shit than our intrepid 17 intelligence agencies.

Do I have to draw you a picture here?

Watch the fireworks as he assumes command of the agencies he's about to destroy.

How many times have I told you our Congress and Courts and even at a much marginal level now [after a year and a half of HOUSE CLEANING] our Executive Branch, is riddled chock full of and filled to the gills and stuffed to the brim with INTELLIGENCE ASSETS?

HOW MANY TIMES have I told you what an absolutely fuckin' TRAVESTY it is that undercover/disguised/sheep-dipped CIA agents like ADAM SCHIFF are still ALLOWED to 'run for office' and 'win' a seat in the House or the Senate, where they PRETEND to exercise 'oversight' over the fuckin' intelligence agencies?

THAT'S.

NOT.

WHAT.

THEY'VE.

BEEN.

DOING.

Your faithful and intrepid 'elected' Senators and House Reps. 'exercising oversight over the intelligence agencies' is the BIGGEST FUCKIN' ILLUSION EVER FOISTED ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

WHAT fucking oversight of the intelligence? What is this 'oversight' of which you babble to me?

There's no oversight. The intelligence agencies own undercover agents and assets ARE SITTING IN THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEES.

Please tell me your not still falling for this corrupt shit?

The reason all these Senators and House Reps who sit on those important 'oversight committees' are freaking out over this latest move by Trump in appointing Pulte to the DNI office is because they KNOW what Pulte just spent the last year DOING to their hidden and secret and illegal intelligence agency slush funds.

THEY KNOW.

THEY KNOW WHAT HE'S BEEN DOING.

He already shut down the FHFA end of the slush fund pipeline. Now he's going to the DNI's Office because Tulsi's departure opened a door for Trump to put him DIRECTLY IN CHARGE over all of these intelligence agencies as he oversees the shutting down of the OTHER END of the pipeline.

And NONE of the fake Congressmen who are really intelligence agents/assets [domestic and foreign] want to see that happen.

Tulsi cleaned the house and did the declasses in regard to a lot of things. But for the next step, it's best for the guy with intimate knowledge how all these hidden NGO/LLC slush funds hidden in the FHFA got there, which agencies controlled them, and what changes to the structure of these agencies need to be made to permanently prevent any reoccurrence of any of this shit.

https://x.com/drawandstrike/status/2062506360302923932

Allegedly fake and ghey

No, this document is not legitimate. It is a well-known forgery circulated in tax protester and sovereign citizen circles for decades. It does not appear in any official IRS archives, historical records, or publications from 1975 (or any other time).<grok:render card_id=“42f62e” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">10</argument></grok:render>

### Why It’s Fake

• No matching official record: Searches of IRS historical documents, annual reports from 1975 (under Commissioner Donald C. Alexander), and Supreme Court cases from that era turn up nothing like this. The IRS did not issue any such memo instructing district directors to stop taxing wages or compensation based on a nonexistent 1975 Supreme Court ruling.<grok:render card_id=“489d7f” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">13</argument></grok:render>

• Signature and formatting issues: The purported signature of Donald C. Alexander does not match known examples, and the document’s style/content is inconsistent with genuine IRS internal memos.

• Classic tax protester hoax: This fits the pattern of fabricated “IRS admissions” claiming wages/labor aren’t taxable income. Similar fakes (e.g., alleged 1985 letters from later commissioners) have been debunked for years. Courts and the IRS consistently label these as frivolous.<grok:render card_id=“00fbc2” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">55</argument></grok:render>

ChatGPT (or similar AI) may have “clarified” it by summarizing the text without verifying authenticity—AI models can hallucinate or fail to fact-check historical documents.

### The 16th Amendment and Taxation of Wages

The 16th Amendment (ratified 1913) states:

> “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”

This directly overturned the Supreme Court’s 1895 Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. decision, which had limited unapportioned income taxes. It gives Congress broad authority to tax all income, explicitly including wages, salaries, and compensation for personal services.<grok:render card_id=“59aaeb” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">0</argument></grok:render>

• Supreme Court precedent: Cases like Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. (1916) and many others have upheld the federal income tax on wages as constitutional. “Income” includes earnings from labor. Claims that wages aren’t “income” or that the Amendment doesn’t apply to them are frivolous and routinely rejected by courts.<grok:render card_id=“c9eee8” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">23</argument></grok:render>

• IRS position: The IRS explicitly lists arguments denying the 16th Amendment’s validity or its application to wages as frivolous tax arguments, subject to penalties.<grok:render card_id=“a9fa9c” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">10</argument></grok:render>

Relying on this fake document (or similar ones) to avoid filing or paying taxes can lead to audits, penalties, interest, liens, levies, or criminal charges for willful failure to file/pay. The tax system has been enforced on wages for over a century with full judicial backing.

If you have concerns about your specific tax situation, consult a licensed tax professional or the IRS directly (irs.gov). Avoid unofficial “clarifications” from unverified sources.

>>24679160