Anonymous ID: cb68c4 June 4, 2026, 3:14 p.m. No.24679084   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9223

Waitโ€ฆGod will send a strong delusion and most Christians don't know what that means

 

A Bible teacher just said something that should stop every Christian cold. Satan has had his man in the wings since the Garden of Eden. Every generation. Waiting for God's permission to unleash him on the world. And when that moment comes โ€” the Bible says the whole world follows him. Not because he looks like a villain. But because he looks like the answer. In this video I'm reacting to John Barnett's powerful teaching on the Antichrist โ€” Satan's substitute for Jesus Christ โ€” and connecting it to everything happening right now. The Iran Israel conflict and a 2600 year old prophecy about Persia. The strong delusion of 2 Thessalonians 2. The alien disclosure agenda. The remote viewing deception. The UAP files. All of it is pointing to the same thing โ€” a world being prepared to receive a counterfeit savior. And the Bible warned us about every single piece of it. Watch until the end โ€” because what John Barnett says about the strong delusion will completely change the way you read the news.

Anonymous ID: cb68c4 June 4, 2026, 3:29 p.m. No.24679108   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9110

So, if power companies are disabling AC compressors and tweaking thermostats across the nation "to reduce load" all year long, why the ever-living FCUK are these city-sized "data centers" being constructed everywhere? If these AI companies can afford what they're building, can't they afford their own generators and possibly even mini-nuclear reactors?

Anonymous ID: cb68c4 June 4, 2026, 4:03 p.m. No.24679209   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>24679188

Attorney's name was Becraft, not Docraft.

 

https://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/buildfreedom.com/tl16f.htm

 

THE BECRAFT STRATEGY

Mr. Becraft's strategy was to establish in court certain weaknesses of the IRS, namely:

 

The supposed "income tax" is really an excise tax which only applies to certain classes of people, engaged in certain activities.

The 16th Amendment grants no additional taxing power to the federal government.

An individual (as opposed to a corporation) has a natural right to live, work, and own property, without being taxed.

Individuals have the right to produce earnings and income, not subject to taxation.

Individuals have the right to combine their activities in the form of partnerships; this is a natural right, independent of and antecedent to government.

 

[This is a very important principle. The American political system is based on the principle that individuals have rights which precede the Constitution and are not dependent on it. In other words, the Constitution or Bill of Rights doesn't grant any rights; our rights are senior to these documents. The Constitution does grant the federal government certain very limited powers which are specified. It also stipulates, through the Bill of Rights, that the federal government's role is limited to the specific powers granted. As a result, today, practically everything the federal government does is unconstitutional, illegal, and criminal. A famous Supreme Court case reflects the seniority of individual rights to government:

 

"The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).

Nowhere in the entire Internal Revenue Code is any individual made liable for the income tax. This is not an oversight. In contrast to the income tax, the alcohol tax is so clearly worded that nobody could misinterpret who is liable for it. (The prosecution did not attempt to challenge or refute this point. They were unable to show a statute that makes anyone liable for the income tax.)

The mission statement of the IRS states that the income tax relies upon voluntary compliance. (The head of the alcohol and tobacco tax division of the IRS has stated to Congress that the income tax is 100% voluntary, while the alcohol tax is 100% mandatory.)

 

In his own defense Mr. Long then stated the following:

 

The income or earnings from the exercise of an individual's common right cannot be taxed as an excise or otherwise.

Nowhere in the IRS Code does it make him liable for the tax.

The income tax is voluntary.

Mr. Long sent the IRS a series of letters, asking the IRS questions such as, "Am I required to file income tax returns?" and "Am I liable for federal income taxes?" The IRS never gave a direct answer to any questions. [Through this series of letters, Mr. Long created a legal foundation. The fact that he believed he was not liable was legally established. This makes it very difficult for Mr. Long to be convicted of a crime, which requires willful intent - the knowing intent to do wrong. Mr. Long established that he could not be guilty of willful failure to file, because he believed he didn't have to file. This principle has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court: "If the defendant had a subjective good faith belief, no matter how unreasonable, that he was not required to file a tax return, the government cannot establish that the defendant acted willfully." Cheek v. U.S., 111 S.C. 604 (1991).]