Anonymous ID: fcad60 June 5, 2026, 4:58 p.m. No.24683392   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3425 >>3502 >>3589

>>24683353

Canada #94

EU Climate Scam Exposed: IPCC Admits Doomsday Scenario Was “Implausible” Garbage – But Brussels Refuses to Scrap a SINGLE Regulation Built on the Lie

 

by Drieu Godefridi Jun. 2, 2026

 

The House of the Great Climate Scam is collapsing. The United Nations’ own climate priesthood has finally admitted what skeptics have screamed for years: their favorite apocalyptic scenario, RCP8.5 – the one predicting civilization-ending warming, floods, fires, and famines unless we destroy our economies with Green New Deals – is “implausible.” Fake. Junk science sold as gospel.

 

But here’s the real bombshell the fake news won’t touch: The European Union, that bloated bureaucratic beast strangling its citizens with Net Zero madness, hasn’t pulled even one document, “scientific” report, regulation, or taxpayer-funded scare tactic based on this now-discredited fairy tale. Not a single one. Trillions in subsidies, destroyed industries, skyrocketing energy bills, and farmers rioting in the streets – all propped up on a foundation of lies.

 

The Big Lie That Powered the Green Grift

 

For over a decade, EU apparatchiks at the European Environment Agency (EEA), Joint Research Centre (JRC), Climate-ADAPT, and even the European Central Bank leaned hard on RCP8.5 as their “high-emissions” nightmare fuel. Sea-level rise maps? RCP8.5. Extreme fire weather? RCP8.5. Heatwaves, droughts, flooding Armageddon? All RCP8.5. The PESETA projects hammering agriculture, coasts, energy, and tourism? Straight out of the RCP8.5 playbook. Bank stress tests? You guessed it.

 

These “experts” hyped impossible futures – all to justify the European Green Deal, Fit for 55 insanity, carbon taxes, EV mandates, heating bans, and deindustrialization that’s gutting Europe. Roger Pielke Jr. nailed it: These scenarios produced “impossible futures” that dominated policy anyway.

 

Now the IPCC’s scenario team is quietly retiring RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5 for the next assessment round because it’s detached from reality. Even they can’t pretend anymore.

 

EU Spin Meets Brutal Reality: Everything They Said Was Wrong

 

Brussels’ climate cultists are scrambling. They claim RCP8.5 can be “retired” thanks to the glorious march of renewables (wind and solar, of course) and policy “progress.” Pure fantasy. Record CO2 emissions: The world pumped out more fossil fuel CO2 than ever in 2025 – another all-time high, with 2026 trending the same. Global emissions keep climbing. China, India, and the rest of the world aren’t playing the suicide game.

 

Renewables (sun & wind)? A pathetic 3% of primary energy. Not only electricity – primary energy, the stuff that actually powers civilization. Wind and solar as a substitute to fossile fuels and nuclear are intermittent jokes. Their real system costs – backup, grid overhauls, distribution nightmares – make them the most expensive energy sources on the planet. They aren’t “displacing” fossil fuels at scale. They’re expensive add-ons.

 

The EU’s own data and global stats confirm it: The “renewable revolution” is a subsidy-sucking mirage. Emissions are still rising. The world is not on the low-carbon path these models assumed. RCP8.5 wasn’t killed by green virtue – it was always detached from how humans actually use energy.

 

Yet the EU’s regulatory edifice stands untouched

 

Every impact assessment, every adaptation plan, every scare-mongering communication citing this garbage remains official gospel. Why? Because admitting the fraud would mean repealing the Green Deal, admitting they wrecked livelihoods for nothing, and facing the rage of voters already freezing in the dark and paying through the nose.

 

This Is the Greatest Policy Fraud in History

 

Think about it: Trillions wasted. Energy poverty exploding across Europe. Industries fleeing to places that laugh at Net Zero. Farmers blockading roads because they can’t compete with insane regulations rooted in debunked models. And the “experts” who peddled this? Still cashing checks, still demanding more power, still smearing skeptics as “deniers.” Senior EU officials are so unhinged they’re assaulting scientists who dare speak the truth. That’s not science – that’s a cult.

 

Alarmist Porn

 

The Gateway Pundit has been exposing this grift for years. The IPCC just handed us the receipts. RCP8.5 was never a plausible baseline – it was alarmist porn to scare politicians into surrendering sovereignty and wealth to Brussels and the UN.Europe deserves better. Citizens deserve refunds. Industries deserve relief. And the EU bureaucracy deserves a reckoning.

 

Time to scrap the entire Net Zero house of cards built on this fraud. Before it bankrupts Europe, tomorrow the USA? The “implausible” scenario is dead. The policies built on it? Still very much alive – and killing. Wake up.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/eu-climate-scam-exposed-ipcc-admits-doomsday-scenario/

Anonymous ID: fcad60 June 5, 2026, 5:31 p.m. No.24683540   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24683519

From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Matter of Russel-Jay

 

Opinion

04-C-108-C

March 29, 2004

ORDER

BARBARA CRABB, Chief Judge, District

 

Plaintiff Russell-Jay: Gould has paid a $150 filing fee and filed a number of documents apparently intended to constitute a proposed civil complaint. Upon review of plaintiff's complaint, I conclude that it should be dismissed forthwith on the court's own motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

 

A district court may dismiss a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on its own motion where the claims are "so insubstantial, implausible, foreclosed by prior decisions of [the United States Supreme Court], or otherwise completely devoid of merit as not to involve a federal controversy." Steel Company v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 1010 (1998) (citing Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. v. County of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661, 666 (1974)).

 

In what appears to be the primary pleading captioned "GLOBAL-POSTAL-UNION-TREATY. FOR THIS CLAIM OF THIS MARRIAGE-UNION IS WITH THIS TREATY OF THIS FEE WITH THIS TERRITORY OF THIS NORTH-CAROLINA, DI-STRICT OF THE COLUMBIA AND DI-STRICT-COURT/PORT WITH THESE UNITY-STATES OF OUR WORLD, plaintiff makes nonsensical conclusory statements. There are no factual allegations from which an inference might be drawn that plaintiff's rights have been violated under federal law or the United States Constitution, or that plaintiffs' rights under state law have been violated by defendants who reside in a state other than the same state in which the plaintiff resides. Indeed, there are no factual allegations at all.

 

Because nothing in plaintiffs' pleading permits an inference to be drawn that there exists a case or controversy over which this court might have jurisdiction, the complaint will be dismissed on the court's own motion for lack of jurisdiction.

ORDER

 

IT IS ORDERED that on the court's own motion this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

 

https://casetext.com/case/in-matter-of-russel-jay