lawfag here
i never noticed it
so after your post i clicked on the link
OMG
i scrolled for about half a page before gagging
that shit is sick sick sick
it wont last IMO opinion it is legally actionable CP material
someone posted the legal CP definition a few breads back
this is well inside that definition
any fags have that link or reference to the legal case?
as for federal statutes there is a HUGE loophole that allows this trash - which is:
"digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor…"
full text below
this needs to change to eliminate this loophole
Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.