Scott Adams' case is a special one.
I agree that most outlets would think about what makes the money come in and choose accordingly.
Scott has found market value in being authentic, voicing his own insights with honesty so as to tap into that abstract good which is 'integrity'.
He did well with his deeper insights in POTUS' modus operandi.
His take on Q is his most surprising move to date IMO.
I'll repost here what I posted 3 breads back:
The nice thing about Scott Adams denying the existence/truth of Q is mainly that the topic is discussed on his twatter.
So this gives us exposure in more mainstream feeds.
In this case a feed where anons can join the discussion, not just top down ridiculazing.
First thing I noticed was the almost unhinged denial by Scott: very out of character for him.
Anons started to pour in with "proofs" on his feed.
This could prove to be the homeopathic dilution needed to redpill Joe Sixpack.
Moreover, this happens well away from the intense shilling and sliding we are used to around here.
Much better odds to reap the fruits of our labor IMO.
I could be wrong in my reading of all this, but is my take on recent developments, FWIW.
So all in all a very clever move.