We must never forget that we are winning, guys. In light of all the tremendous number of false statements made about Q in the fake news media this week, I've had the following on my mind today:
-
the unredacted (and presumably incriminating) FISA evidence is on deck to be released;
-
there are currently approximately 50,000 sealed indictments, waiting to be unsealed; and
-
Q's appearance in our lives came only days after President Trump made his ominous "[y]ou'll find out" statement after he characterized his October 2017 meeting with military officials as THE 'CALM BEFORE THE STORM'.
Never forget: in his 4th and 6th posts to us, Q asked us "[w]hat Supreme Court decision opened the door for a sitting President to activate [military commissions]?"
We must never forget what is to come. I want to share an interesting law review article with you guys, because it provides a decent overview of what could come and it points us toward some other areas that we can research. (Split) link is here: https:// open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2825&context=wmlr
The Introduction to the article quite reassuringly states the following:
''When the Framers of the Constitution set forth the balance of power between the branches of the federal government and the rights of individuals, the central concern was the concentration of power in the hands of one person. The United States Supreme Court voiced this opinion by stating: "[w]icked men, ambitious of power, with hatred of liberty and contempt of law, may fill the place once occupied by Washington and Lincoln; and if this right is conceded, and the calamities of war again befall us, the dangers to human liberty are frightful to contemplate."' This language illustrates the United States history of fearing excessive power in one individual.
The military implicates one of the most difficult issues regarding this balance of power. While the President is the Commander in Chief and must be afforded all the powers and abilities to effectively manage the military, Congress has the power to both declare war and enact legislation to fund and govern the military. This balance was tested in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which examined the President's ability to try certain individuals in a military tribunal. This note will first examine the history and authority for military commissions.''
________
I think we should take a look at: (1) the cases and statutes cited in this article, (2) 10 U.S. Code, Chapter 47A - Military Tribunals (https:// www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/subtitle-A/part-II/chapter-47A) and (3) any and all information that we may find as we dig further into where things could be heading.
Stay hopeful, Anons.
WWG1WGA