Thank you Baker.

Lotta naysayers today.

If Trump came out tomorrow and said, "I don't know anything about this Q."

Wouldn't that fit perfectly as part of The Plan?

Or would that cause too much confusion?

BTW, I don't think Trump will do that, but I was just curious as to how we would handle something like that.

>>2473742

Something slightly creepy about that Emily Bloom. To me, anyway.

>>2473850

Dems should be scared of what Q is doing.

And the dems would absolutely want Q to be fake.

But, how does that explain Scott Adams … 3 days after meeting with POTUS?

I can't believe Scott didn't as the ultimate question ….

>>2474039

Wouldn't this be considered an attack on a US military installation?

At the very least, a domestic terror attack?

Feds should now be involved … that is if anyone can wake the fucking cookie baker from his nap.

>>2473806

> Adams used reverse psychology.

> …. but… yeah, in my mind he's actually on board.

Wow.

Just wow.

>>2473931

>>2473754

>Who is this we shit, you got mice in pockets? How would you handle it 'CernAnon

Because WWG1WGA, I thought I'd pose the question to anons.

Are you not on board with WWG1WGA ?

Personally, I wouldn't know what to think if Trump disavowed Q.

I'd be confused though, for sure.

You don't have to answer it, fucktard. You can just scroll on by so as not to knock loose your buttplug.