NONE of us (with any sense anwyay) are fans of this cuck - but he occasionally does some good work. Observe:
https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor/status/1026266313788813312
>There is no downside to public disagreement about whether Q is legit.
>It allows the good guys to operate under cover of confusion as public slowly become aware.
>It gives bad guys an opening to hope they are still golden. "Maybe they don't really know after all."
>Proving Q is legit only helps eliminate that false sense of security. So why prove Q? Better to let the proof happen when US Marshall breaks down the door.
This is, in a nutshell, my position as well. Belief in Q is irrelevant, when the public debate is going on the information is being spread at a geometric rate vs when it was just us trying to spread info.
Too many 'big name' personalities being on board right now is actually detrimental as it will simply facilitate yet another change in tactics and discourse. Best that even those that 'are' on board are either in the dark corners lurking or, better yet, gently but publicly 'disavowing' and by doing so promoting MORE discussion.
They are then able to, under cover of 'debunking', able to discuss openly, ask probing questions and thereby injecting topics into the public discourse - RED PILLS FOR ALL!
how do you think I saw that thread…
Updated Q-Frog