>>2475254 (lb) (this fishing should be fun)
If you're a shill, you're horrible at both insults, and at trying to use chan nomenclature, get re-trained. The following is in case you're not a shill, you're still horrible at insults, but i like you possible newfag, you made me laugh...and laugh and laugh and still laughing as I shitpost this nonessential retort
Re_read crumbs, they inspire confidence. It's pretty often that confidence is mistaken for arrogance. That's fine, tell's me much about the accuser.
Have to ask, you make a distinction between Q and Anons, yet, you use the term 'QAnon', so tell us, what is 'QAnon'?
We agree on one thing, that Autitsts would look into the tripcodes showing up attached to books in google results, I did it myself when it was a topic here months ago. There was no mystery there, and there is none now. Those tripcodes and some of Q's stringers were being An Autist would also know that most people won't give a shit about that, it proves nothing is regard to the actual INTEL which Q has actually dropped using said tripcodes. Are we here to decode tripcodes, or to use this INTEL for the benefit of ourselves & others, now and in the future? Use LOGIC. Stay on point.
Not that it's important, though you should double the IQ score for the sake of accuracy.