>>2475261

Yeah none of those things could be happening without Q /s/

POTUS has my support, not Q. Q could be real or fake, doesn't fucking matter at all. But right now I'm leaning to a larp… too many outs.

Faking images = disinfo

wrong prediction = disinfo

Correct prediction = Q is real!

demonstrably wrong about antifa/nazi connection = disinfo

Q has every angle covered, he can be correct or wrong and still has the argument that he's "trolling the cabal". Even if POTUS came out and denounced Q, people would still follow because Q would tell them to, with a wink saying trust the plan. It's easy to believe something we WANT to be true, much harder to be skeptical.

>>2475637

Extremely dangerous position right now. Q is meant to come off as a LARP, by design. Using fake images and disinfo. Lets play a game;

1. Q is real. Normies get redpilled, great awakening, mass arrests of scumbags. All good things.

1. Q is a "larp" (MOS/CIA/OTHER). Filling people's heads with how much disinfo? CIA tactic to cover shit up is to tell the truth mixed in with so much BS that people will toss the WHOLE thing out because it's too dirty and confusing to figure out. And ANY attempts at justice are scoffed at because of "muh pizzagate" or "muh roswell" etc etc.

-If a larp, this can be extremely damaging to POTUS' goals. (but begs the question why POTUS didn't denounce publicly earlier)

-Dangerous to National security (uncontrolled massive movement with unknown leader) Move to force internet ID laws?

Obviously we can't know, by sheer design it Q is meant to confuse (maybe not only us).