New Library of Election Evidence “Attack Vectors” — Election Crime Bureau Provides 800+ Findings In 42 Categories

The Election Crime Bureau published a stunning central library of election findings (visit the Evidence tab). They identify 10 main “Attack Vectors” through which election outcomes are shaped or shielded from scrutiny. Each of the 800+ findings from past elections supports President Trump’s assertions that our elections can be stolen – and were in 2020.

The 42 subcategories (domains) span every critical layer of our election infrastructure. This collection of open-source intelligence (OSINT) is the best we’ve ever seen. Many of the categories are rarely discussed in public, such as Cartel Funding, Privileged Access, and Willful Neglect. Note: The Federal government has access to even more evidence.

The depth of the project proves we can no longer think of election corruption as local or regional issues conducted by ignorant officials or bad actors. It must be treated as a national security threat. When serious issues arise, a coordinated national effort should be undertaken rather than relying on local groups that need to quickly find volunteers.

Patrick Colbeck, a highly experienced tech engineer and former MI Senator, authored much of the evidence. He said, “Our election systems have been designated as critical infrastructure. In this light, any attempt to undermine our election system should be viewed as an attack. Military planners divide warfare into several domains – land, sea, air, cyber, and space. The notion of attack vectors with elections takes a similar approach.”

In election security, an “attack vector” is the path or method used to compromise an election. Think of it as the route of attack, rather than the attack itself. The person carrying out the attack is known at the “threat actor”, and the actual exploitation event is considered the “attack”.

Patrick Colbeck, a highly experienced tech engineer and former MI Senator, authored much of the evidence. He said, “Our election systems have been designated as critical infrastructure. In this light, any attempt to undermine our election system should be viewed as an attack. Military planners divide warfare into several domains – land, sea, air, cyber, and space. The notion of attack vectors with elections takes a similar approach.”

In election security, an “attack vector” is the path or method used to compromise an election. Think of it as the route of attack, rather than the attack itself. The person carrying out the attack is known at the “threat actor”, and the actual exploitation event is considered the “attack”.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/new-library-election-evidence-attack-vectors-election-crime/

Supreme Court Strikes Down Democrat Hawaii Law Restricting Concealed Carry Permitholders

In a major win for Second Amendment rights, the Supreme Court has sided with three Hawaii residents, overturning a law that barred concealed-carry permitholders from exercising their rights in public.

All three liberal justices dissented in the 6-3 ruling.

Hawaii enacted the measure, known as Act 52, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment expansion.

Act 52 requires concealed carry permitholders to get explicit permission from a property owner, either verbally, in writing or via a “clear and conspicuous” sign, before carrying handguns on private property that is open to the public.

Three Hawaii residents — Jason Wolford, Alison Wolford and Atom Kasprzycki — and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition challenged the provision in federal court.

They won before a district judge but sought the Supreme Court’s review after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit sided with the state.

“This law departs sharply from the standard common-law rule on access to private property held open to the public. Under that rule, everyone, including those lawfully carrying firearms, may enter unless expressly prohibited from doing so. By contrast, under the new Hawaii law, no one carrying a firearm may enter without the property owner’s express authorization,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion for the court.

“This regime hobbles what the Second Amendment protects: the right of Americans to carry arms for self-defense as they go about their daily lives. We hold that the law is unconstitutional.”

This comes after the Supreme Court also ruled in favor of gun rights for marijuana users in Texas after a man argued his Second Amendment was violated by a law barring gun ownership by anyone who uses drugs illegally.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-democrat-hawaii-law-restricting/

Supreme Court Sides with Trump, Allows Immigration Officials to Block Migrants Who Show Up at US-Mexico Border Seeking Asylum

The US Supreme Court on Thursday sided with the Trump Administration and allowed immigration officials to turn away migrants who show up at US-Mexico border seeking asylum.

In a 6-3 decision, the high court ruled that migrants cannot apply for asylum until they step foot in the United States.

The three liberal justices, Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson dissented.

In a rare move, Sotomayor read her dissent from the bench.

Conservative Supreme Court Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion.

“In ordinary speech, no one would say that a person “arrives in” a place—for example, a house, a city, or a country—before the person enters that place,” Alto wrote.

“The context in which the phrase “arrives in the United States” is used in the immigration statutes at issue here supports an ordinary-meaning reading. So does the presumption against extraterritoriality. We therefore reverse,” Alito wrote.

U.S. immigration officials can turn away asylum seekers at the Mexican border, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.

In a 6-3 decision, the justices greenlit a “metering” policy devised under the Obama administration and expanded during President Donald Trump’s first term, under which Customs and Border Protection agents posted on bridges between Mexico and the U.S. turned back many asylum seekers.

The high court’s ruling overturned lower-court decisions that found Congress intended to permit any immigrant approaching a border checkpoint to file for asylum.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/supreme-court-allows-immigration-officials-turn-away-asylum/

In the fourth and final decision issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Mullin v. Doe, a case concerning whether the Administration may terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations.

In a majority opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court held that the challengers—TPS beneficiaries from Syria and Haiti—were not entitled to interim relief blocking the termination of their TPS designations.

The Court concluded that the TPS statute limits judicial review of non-constitutional claims and prevents courts from second-guessing the agency’s TPS termination decisions on those grounds.

Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson.

The decision represents a significant victory for the government concerning TPS terminations and the scope of judicial review in immigration matters.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/scotus-paves-way-trump-admin-end-tps-haiti-syria

Another 6-3 decision

>>24757869

The same three dissenting every time.

Term limits for judges or removal for failing to follow the constitution.

>>24758312

>Hey! Allstate, Just had incident with a MacTruck can you send tow?