Anonymous ID: 27bca6 Aug. 5, 2018, 10:59 p.m. No.2476233   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6298

>>2476200

>The last thing a LARP would want would be for someone to actually ASK POTUS about Q

 

Unless he wants to end it.

Q has been doing this shit for 9+ months too.

He must be exhausted and bored. Wants to gloat and move on with his life.

Anonymous ID: 27bca6 Aug. 5, 2018, 11:06 p.m. No.2476308   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2476063

>To me, if Trump is asked about Q, his answer is a win/win.

I agree with this.

I also think Trump will speak on Q soon, before the mid terms.

Trump isn't one to divide his base, especially before an election that could result in a dem controlled house that would bring in peach mints.

Trump needs zero distractions for the mid terms. He needs his supporters united, not divided.

We'll get something from Trump about Q soon, I think.

Anonymous ID: 27bca6 Aug. 5, 2018, 11:33 p.m. No.2476529   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2476476

 

She answered the question about Q by saying POTUS condemns all violent groups.

The question itself was shady af and meant to tie Q with violent groups.

She could have separated Q from the violent groups in the question but she didn't.

Most likely an oversight, but I found it telling.

 

If Q is close to POTUS, would Sarah let this tie-in question with violent groups go uncorrected?

Would Sarah let the msm report or insinuate that Q was just another violent conspiracy group?

I wouldn't think so.

Just another odd inconsistency in this whole operation.

Anonymous ID: 27bca6 Aug. 5, 2018, 11:59 p.m. No.2476712   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6766

>>2476695

>watch for a false flag involving physical attacks on news reporters and possibly a mass shooting at a newsroom.

 

Likely, yes.

But it won't be a big name news org, only some small shit tier place unconnected to any of the national cunts.

BTW, I'm trying really hard to feel any sympathy for those propagandists if they do get a FF.

Cunts. All of them.