Is there a way to run all the recent simultaneous mainstream Q articles through a plagiarism checker?
They're all equally misinformed so it seems they have a source template they all used. Like not a single editor asked the writer, "Do you even know what the hell you're talking about here? Where's your fucking research man, because this looks like you're just winging it."
Not even one of the alternative media has asked a WH source to confirm/deny for the last 6 months of heavy speculation and growth.
Anyone find that bizarre?
Franklin Graham the new George Webb? kek
Notice how he "accidentally" avoided naming Praying Medic who has done the best translation work for the normies.
It's like how all the MSM debunkers avoid actually addressing what Q says, instead creating a giant strawman with disinfo.
That was a birddogging setup question, not journalism.
He's like Jimmy Kimmel with a basketball in blackface.
"This is my updated #QAnon Proofs thread—a collection of 55 coincidences, corroborations, and confirmations that confirms the authenticity/legitimacy of Q.
There's many new proofs included in this thread. I've also made a number of revisions or deletions to ensure all 55 Exhibits can hold up to scrutiny."
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1021565150703153153.html
Scott Adams knew that he could use the visit to inject an appeal to authority bias into his persuasion techniques. He's literally using mind control techniques against Q (just like the MSM is obviously doing with their propaganda)