https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116813757947032364
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
It is my Great Honor to announce the nomination of Chris Klomp @1klomp as our next Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS)! His rapid rise in my Administration proves that he is a potential STAR. Chris is a Strong and Inspiring Leader and a Highly Successful Entrepreneur. Everywhere Chris goes, he earns TRUST. He is a person of principle, and is deeply committed to serving the AMERICAN People — and fixing our broken Healthcare System.
HHS is a massive and complex organization, but Chris knows exactly how to run it. He is doing a FANTASTIC job leading Medicare, and overseeing day-to-day operations. Secretary Kennedy, Dr. Oz, and I made this decision together! Chris’ experience building a BIG business gave him the TOUGHNESS to drive desperately needed major reforms, including my Historic MOST FAVORED NATION Drug Pricing Policy, to finally stop foreign freeriding off the backs of the American People. It is time for other countries to pay their fair share, and they’re doing so! Our Drug Prices have come down MASSIVELY in the last year.
Chris puts AMERICA FIRST, and will reform Healthcare to Make America Great and Healthy Again. Congratulations Chris! President DONALD J. TRUMP
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116813202769287423
Supreme Court clears way for Trump administration to revive restrictive policy for asylum seekers
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court cleared the way Thursday for the Trump administration to potentially revive an immigration policy once used to turn back migrants seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border.
The justices, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a lower court order blocking the practice that limited the number of people who could apply for asylum each day, first under the Obama administration and then expanded during President Donald Trump’s first term.
Advocates said the tactic created a humanitarian crisis as thousands of people settled in unsafe makeshift shelters along ports of entry to await their turn for days or months. The Trump administration said it was necessary to deal with an increase in asylum seekers at the border.
The policy is not in place now, and crowds are much thinner as authorities have imposed other restrictions on asylum seekers. The Department of Homeland Security did not say if it plans to revive it, but applauded the ruling. “This decision opens up an important tool to continue securing our southern border,” said James Percival, the agency’s general counsel.
The administration argued that metering is a critical tool used by presidents of both parties and should remain available. Federal attorneys say people turned away at the border could come back later, though lines were thousands of people long when the policy was in place before.
The case is one of several immigration suits the court is considering this term, including Trump’s push to restrict birthright citizenship. The high court also allowed his administration to end deportation for migrants fleeing instability and armed conflict on Thursday.
Under federal law, migrants who arrive in the U.S. must be able to apply for asylum and be screened for fear of persecution in their home countries.
The Justice Department argued that people stopped by authorities haven’t arrived in the country, so immigration agents don’t have to let them apply.
The court’s conservative majority agreed. “A guest does not arrive in a house when he knocks on the front door,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote.
But attorneys for people seeking asylum say the law has long meant anyone arriving at a port of entry should be screened, and blocking arrivals disregards the nation’s ideals.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the bench, saying that the majority’s opinion “regrettably and tragically extinguishes the light of the torch of the Statue of Liberty.”
The decision could also give people a “perverse incentive” to enter the country illegally if they can’t count on being able to legally apply for asylum at a port of entry, she said, a concern that Alito’s opinion said was overblown.
In an unusual exchange, Alito voiced a response after she finished speaking. He expressed surprise that she had read her dissent aloud and defended his opinion by noting that the policy had been used under two presidential administrations. “I won’t add anything more to that,” Alito said.
Metering was first used under President Barack Obama when large numbers of Haitians appeared at the main crossing to San Diego from Tijuana, Mexico. It was expanded to all border crossings from Mexico during Trump’s first term in the White House.
Customs officers often cited reaching maximum capacity in holding cells at the port of entry as a reason for delays in processing asylum seekers waiting to be accepted for inspection, but those claims were refuted by official data that was disclosed in a lawsuit in 2020. Many waiting in Mexico were exposed to violence by organized crime, severe heat during the summer and cold conditions during the winter. The queue was managed differently at each port of entry, sometimes by Mexican authorities, volunteers or migrants.
The policy ended in 2020 when the government introduced greater restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic, and President Joe Biden formally rescinded it in 2021.
The same year, a California-based federal judge found that metering violated the asylum seekers’ rights and the law requiring screening. A divided appeals court panel affirmed the ruling, but nearly half of the judges on the full San Francisco-based court voted to rehear it, a strong signal that might have caught the attention of the Supreme Court.
Since Trump returned to the White House, crowds at international bridges have decreased significantly. In May, the government reported an average of 114 immigrants encountered by customs officers along the southwest ports of entry. Those numbers reached a daily high of 1,703 immigrants in May 2024.
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-immigration-trump-d36d0092617c7115780c06de38e2000f
| MB Ghalibaf
@mb_ghalibaf
America falsely claims our unfrozen assets will buy their agriculture. Interesting. The only crop we're harvesting is what you planted: decades of mistrust. It's organic, abundant, and homegrown. But apparently the US only exports GMO soybeans, broken promises and trash talks.
https://x.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2070119359607869733
Schools panic after YouTuber aces math test in just 18 minutes with AI glasses
Teachers have called for a strong ministry response but feel stuck trying to combat a digital problem with analog tools.
An AI-powered pair of smart glasses solved all 30 questions on a practice math test for the Korean College Scholastic Ability Test, or suneung, in 18 minutes, scoring 96 out of 100 — and a viral video of the feat has schools all across the country on edge.
The clip was posted on Saturday by Techmong, an internet technology YouTuber with 930,000 subscribers. He is seen typing a prompt into a smartphone app linked to the glasses — asking it to identify the correct answers to the questions in front of him — and then using the glasses' built-in camera to scan the test paper. Within 30 seconds, a question's answer appeared on the lenses' display. All but one question was answered correctly, with the single miss due to a scanning error. The video surpassed 600,000 views within three days.
The prospect of high-tech cheating has now become a real fear for Korean schools, with first-semester final exams just around the corner. Last month, a center for the Test of English for International Communication exam, also known as the Toeic, caught a candidate using AI glasses to cheat, setting off a fresh wave of concern.
Schools are scrambling to respond. A middle school in Gyeonggi sent parents a notice stating that smart glasses are "banned from exam rooms" and that wearing them would be "treated as cheating." A high school in Seoul held training sessions for teachers on how to identify smart glasses and manage exam rooms accordingly. "We plan on providing guidance for students on AI glasses in the near future," the school's vice principal said.
Another high school in Gyeonggi said it would ask to borrow metal detectors from the local education office — the same detectors usually lent to suneung venues on exam day. A middle school in Seoul is considering purchasing detectors outright with its own budget.
But teachers say these are stopgap measures at best.
“We are considering using the metal detectors we have for classroom use, but they cannot detect devices made of titanium or plastic," said a high school teacher in Gangwon. “For now, most AI smart glasses currently on the market can still be identified with the naked eye. But given the pace of technological development, it is only a matter of time before products that cannot be visually identified become available. The Ministry of Education and local education offices need to come up with more specific and effective guidelines.”
The education authorities, however, have so far limited their response to calls for stricter supervision. The Ministry of Education sent a circular to regional offices nationwide on June 16, urging tighter exam management. For the annual national suneung in November, the ministry said it plans to explicitly list AI glasses as a prohibited item.
On June 18, the Gyeonggido Office of Education sent schools a circular highlighting five AI glasses models currently available on the market. The Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education had already issued its own guidance on June 11, telling supervisors to watch for candidates whose glasses have unusually thick temples or who repeatedly touch the temple area during the exam, and to inspect their glasses immediately after any test if behavior appears suspicious.
Among teachers, frustration is growing that the authorities expect analog vigilance will be able to counter digital threats. Experts are calling for a more proactive government response.
"We need educational alternatives — such as having students sign a voluntary pledge acknowledging penalties for possessing smart glasses, and strengthening punishments," said Kim Myuhng-joo, executive director of the AI Safety Research Institute and a professor in the Department of Information Security at Seoul Women's University.
"To ease the burden on teachers and reduce student anxiety caused by the rapid evolution of digital devices, we need systematic procedures — such as requiring supervisors to directly inspect the glasses of any student wearing them before and after the exam — along with clear, practical administrative guidelines that can actually be applied in the field," said Park Ju-hyung, a professor at Gyeongin National University of Education.
https://www.koreajoongangdaily.com/korea/schools-panic-after-youtuber-aces-math-test-in-just-18-minutes-with-ai-glassesnbsp/12740331
USDA Announces FY 2025 State Payment Error Rates in SNAP
Trump Administration moving to ensure state waste comes with consequences.
(WASHINGTON, D.C., June 24, 2026) — Today, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) released the annual Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payment error rates (PER), which measure how accurately states determine who is eligible for SNAP and how much they should receive.
The national payment error rate for fiscal year (FY) 2025 is 10.62%, far surpassing the congressional threshold of 6%.
FY 2025 National and State Payment Error Rates (hyperlink)
While this is a modest decrease from FY 2024, the FY 2025 rate still shows significant waste at the state level. Including both overpayments and underpayments, this year’s rate represents a collective $10.1 billion in improper payments nationwide.
“These payment error rates are further proof that state accountability is severely lacking in SNAP,” said Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins. “USDA has taken historic action to help interested states curb SNAP waste, and I hope other states, regardless of political leadership, prioritize needy families and the American taxpayer over politics.”
H.R. 1 added new guardrails for states’ payment error rates, implementing real financial consequences for states that mismanage taxpayer dollars. States with error rates at or above the 6% threshold will be responsible for covering 5%, 10%, or 15% of their states’ benefits. The higher their PER, the higher the percentage—and in most cases, as soon as October 1, 2027. The FY 2025 PER is the first year that could be used to calculate those percentages.
In addition to this matching fund requirement, states with PER at or above 6% threshold are required to submit a Corrective Action Plan to USDA’s Food and Nutrition Administration detailing how they will address the root cause of their errors. Some of these states may also be liable for a separate financial penalty as part of the SNAP quality control process.
Visit the quality control webpage (hyperlink) for more information.
https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2026/06/24/usda-announces-fy-2025-state-payment-error-rates-snap
Dr. Maalouf
@realMaalouf
Residents in a neighborhood in Brooklyn, NY, are complaining that they are forced to listen to the Islamic call to prayer 5 times a day, starting as early as 5 a.m.
What should be done in this situation?
https://x.com/realMaalouf/status/2069564365506781467
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
Tehran? Nope. Houston, Texas.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2069930346372534302
Senate rejects measure to restrict Trump's Iran war powers as key Republicans shift votes
The Senate late Wednesday rejected a measure aimed at restricting President Trump's power to wage war against Iran, in a victory for the president and Senate GOP leadership as they seek to quell congressional discontent with the Trump administration's Iran strategy.
The procedural motion failed in a 50 to 47 vote, with two Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski — voting in favor of advancing the resolution by Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, siding with most Democrats. Republican Sen. Rand Paul voted present, and Democratic Sen. John Fetterman voted no.
Just one day earlier, four Republicans voted yes on a separate House-passed resolution to restrict Mr. Trump's war powers, allowing it to narrowly pass. Those same four GOP lawmakers had voted to advance the Kaine resolution in an earlier procedural vote last month — the first time an Iran war powers resolution had moved forward in the Senate after seven failed attempts.
Kaine's resolution would have directed Mr. Trump to "remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran," unless authorized by Congress. It would have required the president's signature if it had passed the House and Senate, unlike Tuesday's resolution, which will not go to the president's desk.
The Kaine resolution's practical impact was unclear since the president would likely have vetoed the measure even if it passed. The Trump administration has also argued the U.S. is no longer engaged in hostilities with Iran since the two sides entered into a ceasefire. And the administration has said it believes the 1973 War Powers Resolution — the law that set up a process for Congress to push back on presidential uses of military force — is itself unconstitutional.
Still, Mr. Trump has publicly and privately vented about the war powers votes, arguing the rebukes from Congress have undermined his efforts to negotiate with Iran.
Those frustrations boiled over earlier Wednesday, when Mr. Trump expressed his discontent during a testy lunch meeting with Senate Republicans, CBS News previously reported. At one point, the president sternly told Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana — who had voted in favor of Tuesday's war powers resolution — to sit down. Cassidy told reporters after the meeting that "[Mr. Trump] raised his voice" and "I lost my temper."
Later in the day, however, signs emerged that some of the Senate Republicans who had previously voted to constrain Mr. Trump's war powers were reconsidering.
Cassidy was briefed on Iran at the White House by Vice President JD Vance and special envoy Steve Witkoff, the senator confirmed on X, writing that the conversation "address[ed] many of my concerns." Cassidy voted against advancing the resolution Wednesday night.
And Paul voted present on Wednesday, despite voting in favor of the last several Iran war powers resolutions. He said on X his goal was to "give the President more space and leverage to negotiate a lasting peace."
"My opinion on the debate over war and executive power has not changed and I have voted that way several times," he said. "But since hostilities seem to be over and the President asked me to give consideration to his negotiating position, I will do so."
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, helped "seal the deal" in conversations with some key GOP members, a person familiar with the matter told CBS News.
The back and forth comes after Mr. Trump signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran to extend the two countries' ceasefire for 60 days and launch talks on Iran's nuclear program, aiming to wrap up a war that polling shows most Americans do not believe was worth the cost.
Mr. Trump thanked his allies in the Senate for Wednesday's vote, writing on Truth Social that it "puts Iran on notice."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-rejects-measure-restrict-trump-iran-war-powers-as-key-republicans-shift-votes/
Supreme Court allows Trump to remove protections from thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants
The Trump administration has sought to terminate Temporary Protected Status for immigrants fleeing war, natural disasters or other catastrophes. Some may now be deported.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court cleared the way Thursday for the Trump administration to remove legal protections from thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants in the United States, meaning they could be subject to deportation.
The court, on a 6-3 vote on ideological lines, ruled in favor of the administration, which asked to continue with its plan to strip Temporary Protected Status from about 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians.
The ruling could also boost the administration’s efforts to remove similar protections from people from other countries as part of President Donald Trump’s hard-line immigration policy.
“This is a tremendous win for the Trump Administration. Today, the Supreme Court affirmed what President Trump has always maintained: temporary protected status is, by definition, temporary,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement.
Writing for the majority, conservative Justice Samuel Alito said that judges overstepped their authority in second-guessing the administration’s decisions. The court also rejected a claim that the decision to remove protections for Haitians was discriminatory.
The law in question “expressly restricts” courts from reviewing determinations made by the Department of Homeland Security on whether to terminate or extend TPS protections, he added.
As for the claims of discrimination against Haitians, Alito said the statements cited by plaintiffs were not “overtly racial” and were “insufficient to show that the termination of Haiti’s TPS designation was based on the race of the Haitian people.”
In dissent, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the majority of soft-pedaling Trump’s comments about Haitians.
“The statements fairly shout, in their racial undertones and overtones alike, that race entered into the president’s resolve to remove Haitians from this country,” she wrote.
Kagan extensively quoted Trump himself, including his 2018 statement that Haiti is a “shithole country” and comments he made during the 2024 election baselessly claiming that Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, were eating people’s pets.
Without protected status, affected people are subject to deportation via the normal legal process. But they can seek other avenues to remain in the U.S. by, for example, claiming asylum.
Geoff Pipoly and Andy Tauber, who were lead counsel in the case before the Supreme Court, said in a joint statement that “simply put, the Supreme Court’s ruling will directly result in thousands of innocent people dying violent, needless deaths.”
“This decision will endanger Haitian TPS holders who fled their homeland in pursuit of what generations of immigrants yearned for when they made the painful decision to leave all they have known: to live in safety,” they said.
Dahlia Doe, a Syrian TPS recipient and lead plaintiff in the case, said the ruling is a “devastating blow to me and thousands of TPS holders and our families who built our lives in this country in good faith.”
“We are real people whose futures now hang in the balance. This is not simply a legal outcome, for us it is the loss of stability, the fear of separation from our families, and the uncertainty of what comes next,” she said in a statement.
Last year, the Supreme Court in two separate decisions allowed the Trump administration to revoke the same kind of legal status from 600,000 Venezuelans in the U.S. The Trump administration argued in court papers that those actions set a precedent that lower courts should have applied to the Haitian and Syrian immigrants, too.
The TPS program, in place since 1990, provides humanitarian relief to people from countries reeling from war, natural disasters or other catastrophes. Recipients have legal status in the U.S. and can apply for work authorization for up to 18 months, subject to extensions.
But former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem concluded that Haiti and Syria no longer met any of the conditions for legal status, saying conditions in both countries have improved.
The State Department currently tells Americans not to travel to either country, with both included on its "do not travel" list.
"Haiti has been under a State of Emergency since March 2024. Crimes involving firearms are common in Haiti. They include robbery, carjackings, sexual assault, and kidnappings for ransom," the State Department says regarding Haiti.
As for Syria, the department says that "no part of Syria is safe from violence."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-allows-trump-remove-protections-thousands-haitian-syrian-rcna263164
Islamic call to prayer faces ban under Left-wing Danish government
Denmark's immigration minister has announced plans to ban the Islamic call to prayer, claiming parts of the country felt like "a suburb of Islamabad".
Morten Bødskov, a member of the centre-Left Social Democrats party, said the new government would resume an investigation into the legality of imposing a ban.
"The call to prayer should not be heard over Danish rooftops," the minister told news outlet Ritzau. "It has no place in Denmark, and you shouldn't be in any doubt whether you've ended up in a suburb of Islamabad when you walk around Denmark."
In parts of the country, such as Copenhagen, bylaws already forbid the call to prayer being broadcast from loudspeakers in minarets because of strict noise limits.
Mr Bødskov also claimed that a creeping "Islamisation" in Denmark was "taking up too much of the public space".
The Adhan, or call to prayer, is performed five times a day to summon Muslim worshippers to their mosque, traditionally via loudspeakers in minarets.
It is the third time a Danish immigration minister has tried to build a legal framework for banning the call to prayer, after similar attempts by the Social Democrats in 2020 and 2025.
Denmark has imposed some of the toughest migration rules in Europe under Mette Frederiksen, the country's Left-leaning prime minister, who began her third term earlier this month.
Under its so-called "ghetto" laws, Danish authorities are allowed to force migrants to relocate from a neighbourhood if it has too many foreign residents.
In some cases, asylum seekers are required to give up their jewellery and other valuable possessions to cover their housing costs, and they receive no financial support if their claim is rejected.
At the height of the refugee crisis in 2015, when more than a million people fled from the Middle East to Europe's borders, Denmark accepted far fewer asylum seekers than its neighbours.
Any attempt by Denmark to ban the call to prayer could face legal hurdles, as the government's investigation weighs up religious freedoms against the rights of residents near mosques.
The Danish constitution enshrines the right to public worship, but there are exceptions, such as bans on anti-democratic preaching and donations to banned groups.
In Germany and Britain, there are strict limits on when a mosque may broadcast a call to prayer, as well as volume limits, to avoid disturbing non-Muslim neighbours.
In a population of around six million, around 270,000 Muslims live in Denmark.
The country also has an estimated 100 mosques, including the Grand Mosque of Copenhagen, which does not issue an outdoor call to prayer under an agreement with local authorities.
Ms Frederiksen started a new term in power this month despite failing to secure a majority in the March elections, which led to months of complex coalition talks.
She managed to form a four-party government with the centrist Moderates, the Left-leaning Social Liberals and the Green Left, in what has been dubbed a "four-leaf clover" coalition.
The coalition also depends on support from the Red-Green Alliance, an eco-socialist movement similar to the Green Party in Britain under Zack Polanski.
Ms Frederiksen called a snap election in March as she sought a stronger mandate to confront Donald Trump, the US president, who has repeatedly threatened to take over Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/islamic-call-prayer-faces-ban-143635550.html
Watchdog report alleges red-state university trained executives tied to China's defense sector
The watchdog report alleges Missouri State University trained over 1,500 Chinese executives tied to China's military-industrial complex.
A public university in the American heartland spent more than two decades educating executives tied to China's military-industrial complex through a business program that allegedly received taxpayer support, a new watchdog report claims.
The report, titled Heartland for Hire, compiled by the geopolitical research firm Strategy Risks, alleges that Missouri State University (MSU) operated an MBA and Executive MBA pipeline that trained more than 1,500 Chinese executives, government officials and state-owned enterprise managers beginning in 2001, including personnel connected to China's defense sector.
Graduates of the program, according to the report, included executives linked to Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), China's largest state-owned aerospace and defense conglomerate. AVIC has been designated by the U.S. Defense Department as a Chinese military company and has faced U.S. sanctions and investment restrictions over its ties to Beijing's military establishment.
The report's authors argue the program occupied a blind spot in Washington's scrutiny of U.S.-China academic ties, which Fox News Digital has extensively reported on.
"Congressional and executive branch attention to American universities' ties to the CCP has been focused almost entirely on three areas: STEM research theft, issues involving free speech and harassment of Chinese students, and Chinese military-affiliated graduate students in defense-relevant doctoral programs," the report states. "This cadre training problem falls into a gap between existing oversight frameworks."
In a statement to Fox News Digital, a spokesperson for Missouri State University said the school was aware of the report and denied that any taxpayer dollars were used to fund the program.
"As the report further acknowledges, the students studied a ‘conventional business curriculum’ with no evidence of espionage, intellectual property theft, misconduct, false affiliations or complaints of harassment," the spokesperson said. "Students admitted to the program were required to comply with all student visa regulations administered by the U.S. State Department."
The report also alleges that participants were largely recruited and selected through Chinese government agencies, state-owned enterprises and CCP-linked organizations rather than through the university's standard admissions process.
"One of the most significant features of this program is that the CCP – and not MSU – selected the students," the report said.
According to the report, Chinese government documents described the partnership as a "China-U.S. state-to-state cooperation project." The report also identified graduates who later held positions at U.S.-restricted organizations, including AI company iFLYTEK. It alleges the partnership continued after some participating entities were added to U.S. restriction lists.
The report cited Chinese recruiting materials that described portions of the program's costs as being covered by U.S. government or Missouri state-supported subsidies, potentially amounting to tens of millions of dollars. However, the report acknowledges that no public U.S. records confirm those taxpayer-funded payments and that the total amount cannot be independently verified.
"What we uncover instead is evidence of China's state apparatus using a public American university, American accreditation, and American taxpayer dollars to enhance the management and technical capabilities of the individuals who run the CCP's defense industrial base," according to the report.
The report concludes that the Missouri State program reflects a gap in oversight.
"No comparable attention has reached degree-granting pipelines, defense industry participants, or the regional public universities under which the system actually took place," the report said.
Amid growing alarm over Chinese influence in higher education, the report raises fresh questions about national security risks and foreign interference on college campuses.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/watchdog-report-alleges-red-state-university-trained-executives-tied-chinas-defense-sector
Venezuela Twin Earthquakes: USGS Warns Death Toll Could Reach 100,000
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je8BYc5piLs
Big Popz
@BigPopz72
Replying to @GadSaad
Dearborn Michigan…
https://x.com/BigPopz72/status/2069821007968489685
RedWave Press
@RedWavePress
The View’s Sunny Hostin CELEBRATES the Rise of Socialism in America: “I think that New York is the nation’s cultural and political capital, and that’s just a fact. And the Democratic Socialists of America is a force to be reckoned with at this point. I really do believe that.”
“Perhaps it’s time for change. The Democratic Party for a very long time has been searching for an identity and I see a great parallel between the rise of the Tea Party in 2009 as a rebuttal basically to President Obama’s policies and the financial crisis and the Democratic Socialists of America’s rise in 2016 in reaction to Donald Trump, in reaction to healthcare.”
She is openly celebrating the downfall of America.
https://x.com/RedWavePress/status/2069864114218787296
It's a lifestyle I guess.