Anonymous ID: 8604a7 Aug. 5, 2018, 11 p.m. No.2476246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6329

>>2476172

Notice they never refer to /qresearch/ always generic 8 chan, BUT they quote specific content.

 

The often cite /pol/ but avoid giving anyone specifics to come here, just get lost in 8 chan board names

 

A little odd they focus on the fakes, since they have no real info but lots of misdirection like all the Q poseurs

Anonymous ID: 8604a7 Aug. 11, 2018, 11:56 p.m. No.2566005   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6048 >>6114

>>2565862

It basically list sites that don't include proofs then tells the read to figure out the clues by yourself.

 

Doesn't see very helpful.

 

Why not just list the sites and say "look here" and "figure out what this all means"

 

I don;t think that was what Q intended and told us, but explaining would be too difficult and time consuming,

 

We are so busy speculating on theories that "could be true" but we might never know.

Anonymous ID: 8604a7 Aug. 12, 2018, 12:56 a.m. No.2566465   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0456 >>0525

>>2566114

We did what we were supposed to do. make noise be heard.

 

Mission accomplished

 

Those delusional people that think the normie are gonna come here for guidance and explanation are finding out it will never happen.

 

Events will be all the proof needed, as the message has gotten spread.

 

If you couldn't convince people of the other 100 conspiracies, why would you think this one would be different.

 

The communication and convincing skills are most pretty poor (as you have all found out with other conspiracies)

 

Take Q's advice - enjoy the show and education those that ask. They are already partly there.

 

Look at the crowds at Trump rallies. Did you red-pill any of them that you can identify?

Anonymous ID: 8604a7 Aug. 12, 2018, 6:56 p.m. No.2577092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7163

>>2576347

 

1)Who do you think will take the time to read it.

 

2) Why would they think it was believable after ~40 MSM articles told them otherwise?

 

3) Why would you/we be credible