(outline for anons to know how to explain when spreading)

rough outline:

I: Intro

(calls out MSM, say what side by sides and proofs are, give links to qanon.pub, qmap.pub, and qproofs.com)

II: When and Where did Q start to post

(4pol → CBTS → /cbts/ (8) → /thestorm/ → /qresearch/ & /GA/ → /PF/; don't give out the link; kek I "redacted" it; explain WHAT THE FUCK A BAKER DOES)

III: Who posts as Q (NOT doxxing, just laying out facts from crumbs and the signoffs)

IV: What does Q post

(signatures and stringers; the Cabal, +++ ++ +, topics in crumbs; the plan, GA; and moar but just an overview really)

V: Why does Q post

(conclusion, GA, The plan, call out the MSM again; had quote the Declaration, wrap it up)

(6 pages, ~3500 words)

the reader is on multiple occasions to think for themselves, check out graphics, and to read crumbs

it was an idea I had a few days ago, wrote it basically by a stream of consciousness, then anons were very helpful in editing and revising

it says "By Anons"; so we think it should be a /qresearch/ document, not just made by one famewhore like the MSM does

read it over, if enough anons see, read, and approve, we want to post a final version so it can be spread (its gotta watermark, kek)

the plan is to spread it to normies on social media and to websites, then try to push it IRL; for example at rallies, putting copies places, even maybe get it to local papers and the MSM

>>2565254

I'm just going to post the pdf to be spread

a pamphlet is a good way to do that

>>2565452

kek, where would that go?

>>2565526

I'm thinking that "All credit belongs to the Anons of The Board" (added the end) could go in the header area of the first page

>>2565682

gonna edit that now

which UID are you in this bread?

or is this your first time posting??

added "and Q": All credit belongs to the Anons of The Board and Q.

>>2565743

kek, was thinking people could do it at POTUS rallies and shit like that

>>2565765

honestly, not too sure

I was going to post the final PDF, and the final pastebin

then not really sure anon, basically rely on anons and their networks to spread it

how does this look??

>>2565900

point taken

look better?

>>2565894

gotcha

whatever way normies can read this is good with me

>>2565952

made bigger

>>2566005

anon, thats only the first page

>>2566220

>>2566169

BO said its looking good (taking that as a check on it)

>>2566465

>If you couldn't convince people of the other 100 conspiracies

kek msm line

>Those delusional people that think the normie are gonna come here for guidance and explanation are finding out it will never happen.

the board was not linked to, no normies should come here

this is to fight disinfo with info, not bring people here or redpill them at all

its for posterity

>>2573886

will repost

>>2574087

pretty sure that was GP (gateway) not TP

but they said 8chan's QResearch board

"These communications have inspired a 24/7 global research gathering on 8chan’s QResearch Board, composed of tens of thousands of anonymous researchers, who scour all open source information to substantiate, interpret, and expand upon QAnon’s posts. "

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/08/ascending-legacy-media-spotlight-propels-qanon-movement/

not sure, might keep it the way it is

REALLY don't want normies here, they should explore other places, this can be overwhelming

>>2574296

how is this: On Monday, January 8th, 2018, the board still in use today was created, named REDACTED HAHA (this will not be given so it is not disrupted, and will be referred to as The Board).

>>2574494

are you the same anon that wants to put it on the website?

Is that what you're referring to?

>>2574623

all of them still have the water mark

still just the rough draft, don't want to put the finals yet

when I do, I'll post the final pdfs and graphics

>>2574583

gotcha

>>2574680

I'll add that

gimme a few minutes, will update with new graphics (rough draft still), pdf, and pastebin

>>2574734

I posted that excerpt earlier, what are you adding?

but have added that amendment to the end of that sentence, working on the graphics

>>2574917

gotcha, add Qproofs.com (not my site, so not self-promoting kek)

thats a good one too

>>2575213

the problem is, I'm trying to keep the format as is

anymoar changes will break the one page formatting (besides the two page section)

so I am planning to keep it as is

BUT, not everyone needs to use my formatting/PDFs (though they can)

if you want to, format it anyway you want

thats why I have been posting the pastabin too

your point is a good one, just can't be done the way I format the paper

updated graphics, pdfs, and pastabin are coming soon, almost done

updated graphic (regular)

updated graphic (black)

updated pdfs (both black and regular)

updated pastabin

https://pastebin.com/FWd7dUJy

some thoughts on where to spread this

its not an exercise in redpilling, but informing about Q and the Great Awakening

the redpilling would come through further research and understanding POTUS' policies and strategies and reading crumbs, looking at graphics, and following events

some places to push it:

1. Social Media (probably page by page, kek, don't use any)

a. Twatter

b. FB

c. Instagram

d. Tumblr

e. Pintrest

f. any others

1. websites that anons maintain/often post on

2. at rallies, protests, or other gatherings of patriots

3. to family/friends directly

4. letters to the editor (of a local paper)

5. even the MSM (they have places to "send a tip")

6. get YT patriots to do segments on it

7. other ways I didn't think of (I'm sure anons have other ideas)

the moar that read this, the moar that ACTUALLY understand what Q is doing and what the Great Awakening is, just some ideas

>>2576876

AWESOME IDEA

I'm just going to post the original (not good with that stuff)

aesthetics would make it great

its the content is good, any kind of design/coverpage/other additions would just make it better

>>2577120

>>2577092

kek, can't believe a shill decided to come here

8604a7

>Who do you think will take the time to read it.

if they're interested in Q and they see it, they'd learn a lot. doesn't really take that long to read

>Why would they think it was believable after ~40 MSM articles told them otherwise?

no one thinks the MSM is credible, all of what they wrote is nonsense

>Why would you/we be credible

the content speaks for it self

testing the catalog

baking in general, won't be back for a bit

>>2588459

>>2587322

>>2587311

>>2586644

>>2586632

those look GREAT!

>>2587011

I think I want to keep both

the first part explains that Q not only posts as Q, but under other 'signoffs'

and the second explains Q doesn't just post straight forward stuff

but I see what you mean

feel free to edit the copy you make, because the graphic looks awesome!

wait to post the final pdf copy when I do (just a suggestion)

we can start to spread both at the same time (one generic, then as many as we can looking awesome like yours)

>>2587645

I'll work on those tonight, thanks anon

>>2589264

>1

got it and understand, but its eye catching (you're going from a storm to calm aren't you in the graphic???)

>2

we had talked about making a pure bulletpoint version, still think thats a good idea

>3

one anon had said he/she has a website to put it on

we could try to lobby the maintainers of qanon.app and qmap.pub and sites like that to put it there

I'm also thinking some anon should post it on the GA reddit, maybe some of them could spread it too

putting in some of the edits the other anon posted, they're good

>>2587645

wait, why would the comma go INSIDE the slashes of /cbts/???

>>2589780

>>2589423

LOVE the one with the info

really makes it come together and provides moar info

>>2589764

add this anons': 6ecd76

take a look at the theme, it starts as a storm then clears up to sunshine

member, its the info that needs to be spread, whatever format it comes in is secondary imo

>>2590292

>>2590279

thats a great feature

I'm thinking next time the maintainers of the major crumb sites comes around, to ask them to post a link the embeds the Basics

to clarify, I'm putting all semi colons in that list right?

am I reading those right?

>>2590670

gotcha thanks, almost done editing

will just be posting the updated regular pdf and pastabin

these were good edits anon, kek even though all the previous iterations there can be improvements

>>2591124

I thought it was a good idea, and many anons have helped tremendously!

I agree, but the designs that anons posted above really make it pop

you're right the content matters, yet those graphics are awesome

just planing to have a script to work with and let anons and others spread it how they think is best

updated pastabin: https://pastebin.com/vKQUqbqu

updated RD pdf attached

as I said in the intro, I haven't wrote this kind of things in a while

my last few semesters of undergraduate school were all technical lab papers, which were all dry and involved numbers/equations, no narrative

kek, so this needed A LOT of editing

>>2586632

>>2586644

>>2587311

>>2587322

>>2588459

>>2589780

(for general)

>>2591518

see: >>2591280

I'll reread tomorrow too

>>2595181

>>2589780

add qmap.pub, and just qanon.news/Q?

>>2605365

almost done editing, will post the updates

got distracted by Q today

oh anon with the theme/graphic, some anons in general liked it today, showed them some of it

new pastabin:

https://pastebin.com/0BhYgVhJ

updated RDpdf attached

>>2606110

do you mean the anon's website or my updated copy???: >>2605752

>>2606180

see this one: >>2605752

>Check near the end of the first para.; "someone" was left out and replaced with "appear" (Knowing the answers to these basic questions, appear curious about or just starting to learn about Q, can further his or her understanding by reading more crumbs and viewing more graphics. )

fixed that already

>Also check Part III para. 1: The Hunt for Red October (should be italicized) whenrein (sp = wherein)

fixed that already

>Delete sentence end of Line 35-36 (Along with the pictures that points to a connection between Q and the President.)

meh, might want to keep that, because pics do point to that being implied

>Delete brackets, keep commas in Line 42 :Upon her presumed victory, (for which the Cabal unsuccessfully fought,)

do you mean parenthesis?

>>2606294

fixed

thanks for all your edits anon

updated pastebin: https://pastebin.com/tvEV36Yv

updated pdf

>>2606468

o7

night anon

>>2606692

thats awesome, no not yet

soon anon!!

we want it to be as perfect as possible, so we're holding off

see these: >>2591361

others are making better looking ones, but if you just want the plain one thats the one I've been posting

check back in a few days!

>>2607076

not sure anon

Q usually posts the grey background (qanon.app)

>>2607023

put as many links as you think would be helpful anon

>>2608340

see: >>2591361

compiled the links

great idea, other anons (within the thread) are talking about putting up on webistes

would like to see if the maintainers of the major crumb sites would put a link or have it somewhere on their sites

>>2608328

kek this anon wants to translate it, thats a brand new idea

and then of course spread it like everything else that comes from here

I've just been posting the bland document so anons can read (and the pastebin)

but once the final text is done, anything can be done with it

had a long day, got sidetracked with Q and side by sides, will be back tomorrow

its much better than whatever version you saw the first time BO

>>2608370

true, before I go, see this: >>2606692

the anon wanted to translate it

I know google can sometimes mistranslate things or not catch the subtitles but it can be used too

>>2608374

that was my intention, the fake shit the msm has been pushing gave me the idea

I keep saying it, but what they said a baker is really surprised me, really made it moar clear they were disinfo pieces

so thanks msm

I'll see you all tomorrow, tired as fuck

>>2614302

kek going to do those now, had shit to do in the afternoon and came back to Q going wild

one question on this:

>add "singular" to "collective noun" to read " collective singular noun"

I looked it up, I only see "collective noun", would keeping it be fine or is the singular necessary?

>>2623157

THATS AWESOME

updated pdf

updated pastebin:

https://pastebin.com/SdsmvtDb

>>2623455

I think we are getting close, if I were you, start translating what is in the pastebin, any other edits will be small and easy to tweak

>>2623500

ok understood, kek edited it in anyway, took your word for it

>>2623515

nice

honestly, never thought about translations until this other anon

>>2623560

> the chinese into their language

I doubt the commie Chinese would let that happen

but point taken

>>2623625

>>2623601

true, but Q is 'mainstream' and all those disinfo came out

we needed these edits BADLY, but this is very close, a lot of anons have weighed in

maybe release the bland original then let anons make their graphics with it after

I'm thinking soon

chekk the hash BO