Iran's top negotiator says country ready for war as peace talks inch along

By Alex Sundby, Frank Andrews

What to know about the Iran war today:

• Iran's top negotiator told state television that the country is ready for war if the U.S. doesn't fulfill its commitments.

• Iranian and U.S. officials have traveled to Qatar, but aren't expected to hold direct talks.

• An agreement signed four days ago between Israel and Lebanon links an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon to the Iranian-backed group Hezbollah being disarmed. Analysts say that could mean Israel occupying southern

• Lebanon indefinitely, which could continue hampering efforts toward a full U.S.-Iran peace deal.

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/us-iran-war-israel-hezbollah-lebanon-trump-peace-deal/

Sounds like they are just going to try to use the money they get, to start the war again.

House Republican Pitches Bill On Fox News to Ban Pregnant Foreigners From the US

Zachary LeemanJun 30th, 2026

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) is answering President Donald Trump’s call to end birthright citizenship by introducing a bill that would ban pregnant foreigners.

Ogles discussed his bill, the Anchors Away Act, with Fox News’ Will Cain on Will Cain Country, and Cain later played it on his Fox News show on Tuesday afternoon.

“We are literally going to be dropping Anchors Away, which really pushes back against the Supreme Court, this idea that if you are pregnant and you are from a foreign nation, you know what, it is time for Congress to pass a law that says you cannot come here. You cannot have a baby on U.S. Soil and exploit this loophole,” Ogles said.

Ogles’ comments follow the Supreme Court rebuking Trump on an executive order against birthright citizenship. The court ruled that it violated the 14th Amendment.

In the 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, which guarantees citizenship for anyone “born or naturalized” in the United States.

The majority opinion from the court was written by Chief Justice John Roberts. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a dissent and argued Trump’s executive order did not violate the law.

“In my view, the Executive Order does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. But the Order does contravene a federal statute, 8 U. S. C. §1401(a). Congress could—consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment—amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so,” Kavanaugh wrote.

Trump took to Truth Social to blast the court’s decision and demand that Congress step in and act.

He wrote:

The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) also called for action on birthright citizenship on Tuesday and said lawmakers are “looking at” Ogles’s bill.

“We’re looking at that,” he said. “We need to address the issue as quickly and as efficiently as we can.Some are implying that, or suggesting that it may require a constitutional amendment. And as you know, that is a large undertaking.But clearly, birthright citizenship has been abused.”

https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/house-republican-pitches-bill-on-fox-news-to-ban-pregnant-foreigners-from-the-us/

Citizen Free Press

@CitizenFreePres

Laura Coates refuses to say 'biological male'

https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/2072163352625709168

The Canadian Dollar is Collapsing – Here’s What to Expect Next. 1/2

June 30, 2026 | Sundance |

The Canadian dollar is starting to feel the effects of long-term uncertainty. It will get worse.

• …”Since the start of June, the currency has weakened 2.9%, which would be its steepest monthly decline since October 2024, as Canadian bond yields fell further below U.S. yields.”… {source}

Now, this is where you really need to pay attention to details. Remember, the U.K and EU have a vested interest in protecting Canada from economic collapse.

President Trump doesn’t want immediate collapse either -because Xi will move in fast- but Trump isnot going to providethe same financial and economic lifelines that the other four-eyes will trigger.

Reuters is reporting that tomorrow the U.S. will formally declare a “non-extension” of the USMCA trade agreement {ARTICLE} and that triggers a 10-year period to decoupling. It is very important to understand there is a difference between announcing a “non-extension” and announcing a “withdrawal“. TheCanadians are completely confused about what is about to happen.

In anon-extension announcement, the USA is saying they do not want to extend or renew the terms of the agreement beyond the current trade agreement terms. Yes, this is a 10-year exit. However, that’s not the part that matters. Announcing a decision to exit the USMCA (CUSMA), a full withdrawal from the trilateral deal,triggers a six-month countdown to exit.

Thedeadline to announcethe decision to extend is tomorrow,July 1st.There is no deadline on the timeline to announce an exit or withdrawal from the USMCA. That announcement can happen at any time.

Put simply, announcing a non-renewal is a 10-year exit. Announcing a withdrawal is a 6-month exit. The announcement to withdraw can come at any time after the statement of non-renewal.

You can see the confusion in this article:

• WASHINGTON, June 30 (Reuters)– U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is expected to formally declare on Wednesday that it will not extend the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade, starting a decade-long clock to wind down the 32-year-old North American free trade zone as the three countries haggle over proposed changes.

• That declaration will kick off a six-year review session, part of a “sunset clause” negotiated by President Donald Trump’s first administration. However, it will do little to alter contentious negotiations over the pact’s future, including sweeping demands to boost U.S. and regional content in North American automotive production and trade protections to block Chinese goods from benefiting from USMCA. (read more)

The most likely scenario is Trump/Greer first say the USA is not renewing (not extending). Then, at a later date determined by them (in my opinion it will be after the U.S-Mexico agreement is finished), Trump and Greer will then announce the withdrawal, which will trigger the 6-month countdown to exit.==

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/the-canadian-dollar-is-collapsing-heres-what-to-expect-next/

>>24777267

2/2

There is no rush to announce the withdrawal;the only immediate action is to announce a USMCA renewal is not happening.

What this scenario does is put maximum pressure on Canada. As soon as President Trump says the USA will not extend the agreement, all investment into Canada becomes extremely tenuous. The Canadian dollar will weaken further; a slow contraction will begin.

However, Canada will still be oblivious towhat comes next because their media will tell them they have a decade to work things out. They don’t.==

At a time determined by President Trump and USTR JamiesonGreer, they will announce a decision to exit the USMCA which then triggers a 6-month phasebefore the agreement is terminated.

This is where Canada will be caught off guard and theeconomic collapse will likely be rapid and catastrophic.

Canada will only just begin to think about the “exit” scenario, once the non-renewal announcement is made.It will take them a while to realize how vulnerable they are – they are currently in full denial mode.

During this period, President Trump carries massive leverage against Canada. He will likely probe their trade position and willingness to comply with reciprocity after the non-renewal announcement. The outcome of those probes willdetermine the timeline of his exit announcement.

During this non-renewal phase, we may even see President Trump tease the exit, then retract, then tease the exit again. Each time Trump tests the Canadian government with statements, the Canadian economy will pulsate and weaken; it will drivethe Canadian government to either extreme anger, or defeated compliance.

Timing the completion of the U.S-Mexico deal within the probes of Canada will be super interesting. At some point as the U.S. closes in on the deal with Mexico,Canada is going to realize they are naked without any agreement.

Theworst-case scenariofor Canada is President Trump announcing the USMCA exit on the same day he announces a completed bilateral deal with Mexico.

It would be the worst-case scenario for Mark Carney because the ignored voices of those few people in Canada who have been trying to warn about this would suddenly get a lot of attention.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/the-canadian-dollar-is-collapsing-heres-what-to-expect-next/

The NWO was warned for a long time!

I wonder if Carney regrets posting this meme with flipping the bird to Trump?

The Roberts Requirement – Pregnancy Tests for U.S. Travel Visas. 1/2

June 30, 2026 | Sundance

What is proposed below is regulatory, lawful and entirely intended to create hardships and burdens. Thus, a new era in State Department visa requirements respond to newly established guidelines by the Supreme Court.

As a pragmatic and patriotic American I respectfully suggest and recommend the U.S. State Department immediatelyinstitute the “Roberts Requirement” following similar visa entry protocols previously used for COVID-19 tests prior to U.S. admittance.

The Roberts Requirement: Each female visa applicant must present a validnegative pregnancy testtaken no longer than 10 days prior to travel to the United States.

The certified document, negative pregnancy test, together with all related visa approvals must be presented to Customs and Border Patrol at each port of entry. Failure disqualifies the traveler.

This is the same protocol as COVID-19, only using pregnancy status as the disqualifying health issue. It is a lawful regulation, born from a new standard established by the Supreme Court, that does not need congressional approval.

Don’t get stuck on details about why it will not work, it will.

Start thinking like a person who realizes the goal is to create severe antagonism through regulation. That antagonism can then be directed.

Aim isolation, ridicule and marginalization at those who created the problem. This can be done without visible vitriol.

The objective is not just making sure pregnant women do not get visas; that is one small element. The bigger objective is to make it extremely difficult to come to the USA andTHEN pin that global compliance requirement on Chief Justice John Roberts, making him live every day with the consequences of his blinded American stupidity; facing him, belittling him, ridiculing him, sitting on the front pages of his peers and global friends.

Chief Justice John Roberts created this mess, now put it on his doorstep every day.

But people will lie – doesn’t matter.

But people will create fake documents – doesn’t matter.

But people will still overstay their visas – doesn’t matter.

You are putting the emphasis on the wrong aspect.

Make every overburdensome visa rule and travel permit regulation specifically attributable to John Roberts decision. Pre-screenings, pregnancy tests, supplemental bond requirements for 15-to 45-year-old females, shortened visa terms and much more.

No exclusions for diplomats, sports figures, foreign actors, employees, H1Bs, student entry or any other visa type – the works.Make the total visa entry system subject to a regulatory and compliance nightmare at a scale that is unheard of.That is the scale of the problem Roberts has created. Now blame John Roberts for it.

This ‘Roberts Requirement’ applies to all visa types.

The objective, and it can accompany many other requirements such as a “bond” attachment required for 15- to 45-year-old females to travel, is to create such anoverwhelmingly restrictive visa process that it creates ridicule on the SCOTUS decision.

Make every regulation specifically cited to the Supreme Court decision and make it exceptionally burdensome.

Make SCOTUS own the outcome.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/the-roberts-requirement-pregnancy-tests-for-u-s-travel-visas/

>>24777325.

2/2

Canadians and Mexicans also need to comply. The same rules apply to every nation and no longer are visas determined by timeline, but by the number of extensions required or allowed within it.

Every visa has a maximum duration of 3 months, with various extensions possible.

A one-year visa becomes a three-month visa with 4 extensions allowed. At each extension the same origination requirements must be fulfilled.

A two-year USA visa, is now a U.S. visa with 7 extensions allowed, etc.

Student visas carry the same requirement for 3-month extensions.

Require a – refundable at exit – surety bond purchase valued at $500,000 for any non-tourist visa. [Later the bond issuer, sell those non-refunded bonds and release the bounty hunters.]

No visas are exempt from the entry requirements.

This is a new era with new rules that specifically come as an outcome of new judicial rulings. This is not a White House or State Department issue.This is an issue created by the Supreme Court that needs an immediate response.

Congress can fix it, but in the interim – maximum regulatory pressure is applied directly to the wound.

♦ Example of point and counterpoints.

POINT:Canada, Mexico, India or [XXX] will scream this is unfair given the nature of our collaborative visa designations.

Counterpoint: Yes, you are correct. That was then; this is now. The nature of our visa system has changed because SCOTUS has just codified new distinctions on citizenship that now become new visa factors. Your nation does not convey birthright citizenship, so I understand your inability to accept our new terms.Unfortunately, our nation now does convey birthright citizenship, and as a consequence changes are needed.

Don’t back down. Make SCOTUS own it.

Sure, there will be legal challenges, all the way up to the same SCOTUS, and what are they going to do?

Think about it!

Make everyone live by the new rules – that are created by those who didn’t think about the consequences.

(https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/30/the-roberts-requirement-pregnancy-tests-for-u-s-travel-visas/

>>