Anonymous ID: 6c5e13 July 1, 2026, 6:49 p.m. No.24780335   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0339 >>0341

>>24780327

>>24780309

@kkirsch3583

2 hours ago

Don’t forget the Dems lowered the lower end of “normal” on the IQ range in 1980 despite studies by their own Berkeley professors. They dropped it from Low-normal 85 down to low normal 70. Do you know the Army won’t even let you in if your IQ is less than 83?? This was to “avoid stigmatizing a certain demographic.

 

>>24780303

Anonymous ID: 6c5e13 July 1, 2026, 6:53 p.m. No.24780341   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0347 >>0351 >>0368

>>24780335

>>24780327

 

Ohhhh. All of the comments….

 

@Zachcash-c2c

2 hours ago

The military for a brief period during nam did let people in that fell below that.

They were called McNamara's idiots and they stopped it again shortly after because they had a tendency to get themselves k1lled in easily avoidable accidents that also tended to get other people hurt.

 

@DannyStephenson-b7b

2 hours ago

​@Zachcash-c2c

Now the military is full of them. 90% are there for free education and benefits. They're not at all there to defend the nation.

 

@davidyetter5409

2 hours ago

While you are correct about the military and the 83 IQ. The reason is that there is no job in the military that a person in that category can do without constant supervision. That will reduce the overall effectiveness by requiring multiple people required to accomplish a single person task. That's a common sense pragmatic decision.

 

@gawnfishin2day

2 hours ago

​@DannyStephenson-b7b 15 years ago, the higher ups were primarily those that peaked in highschool

6

 

 

@eldritchedward

1 hour ago

@Zachcash-c2c Not just that. The military literally couldn't find a single job these people could do, where they didn't produce greater cost than benefit.

Not even janitorial work and stuff like that.

Anonymous ID: 6c5e13 July 1, 2026, 6:57 p.m. No.24780347   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0363 >>0368

>>24780327

>>24780341

>>24780309

“Born That Way”.

We should steal their Gay slogan and insist it is true…because in this case it is.

 

@markbrown4111

1 hour ago

Fact: The average cranial capacity of Eurasians is 8% larger than that of Africans. East Asians are slightly larger than Europeans. Strange that East Asians have slightly higher IQs than Europeans and both have significantly higher IQs than Africans? It's almost like brain size affects your intelligence, which obviously cannot be true as progressive insist differences in IQ are due to racism! Presumably racism also affects the size of your cranial capacity because it couldn't be something as stupid as genetics!

 

>>24780303

Anonymous ID: 6c5e13 July 1, 2026, 7:04 p.m. No.24780368   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0394

>>24780309

55 minutes ago (edited)

Wait until you find out the American Psychological Association began conducting IQ tests in Africa during the mid 1970s. As soon as the results started to look like they would reveal a below 70 IQ continent, they quickly canceled the testing and pretended it never happened. At the time, that was classified as a significant handicap requiring constant professional supervision or qualified guardianship.

3

 

>>24780347

>>24780341

 

RazorBrain1

1 hour ago

Because with an IQ or general technician score as the military calls it. They have found they cant even teach those people how to cook or clean. Basically they are incapable of governing themselves and taking care of their basic needs.