>>2480525

>>2480423

This is so beyond (((Gay))) . . . .

They're only 9 months behind then.

For the elite level organic "hackers" they claim to be --- logic dictates the 'fake' Q movement should have been quashed w/in months...... not after it's gone to win the hearts & minds of some 350 million regular folks WW.

Try Harder, fag-cunts. Bring your soy milk.

thehill.com/policy/technology/400526-anonymous-vows-to-take-down-expose-qanon

>>2480877

overthetarget.com/seth-rich/

>>2480945

Can someone briefly run down why this dismissal is supposed to be a good(?) thing ???

>>2480974

1985 time stamp?

>>2481085

>>2480974

TY,

yesterday brazier anon.

Nice selfie.

>>2481182

>>2481051

>>2480877

>The Rich family was trying to sue Fox for covering the case. The judge threw it out.

— Still not getting why the Fam would sue Fox for "covering" and event that already happened, already in the news. . . .

W/o proof of damages by FoxNews, what did they hope to gain by filing a losing case??

>>2481326

>>2481298

>>2481237

>>2481051

Given Q's drop on the SR family & attorneys,

makes one think that though SR may have been "woke",

his family likely still not & remain controlled.

Making sense now….

>>2481346

Two linked red arrowed Drops

then two Drops connected in sequence by RT on the markers :33 & :44

appear to me as two double proofs, if that makes sense.