Anonymous ID: d932dc July 9, 2026, 5:32 p.m. No.24808580   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8583 >>8585 >>8587

>>24808341

3766

Dec 28, 2019 1:30:29 PM EST

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 2b1500 No. 7643985

Dec 28, 2019 1:28:43 PM EST

Anonymous ID: b8b53b No. 7643939

 

Screen Shot 2019-12-28 at 19.28.12.png

 

>>7643842

orensicatorโ€™s first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rateโ€”the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNCโ€™s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.

 

These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed.Compounding this contradiction, GUCCIFER claimed to have run his hack from Romania, which, for numerous reasons technically called delivery overheads, would slow down the speed of a hack even further from maximum achievable speeds.

 

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

>>7643939