>>24809460 [PB]
>not in a peaceful way
Oceans aren't peaceful. They're never fully at rest. Waves, undercurrents, tides, storms, whirlpools and more.
Your false-dichotomy choice was deliberately thought-limiting so no answer is merited. My work with radio-frequency propagation, satellite paths/prediction/acquisition and the resulting data dwarfs any flights of fancy that Earth is anything other than an oblate spheroid which has calculable dimensions.
>lend without expecting anything in return
This is known as giving rather than lending. Generosity is the salvation of those blessed with abundance.
Wow. We went down from 60+ UIDs to just 8. Just by a bread shift. Could that many UIDs really be bots? Anons aren't usually so slow to migrate.
I once derived income from working in Silicon Valley's "Blue Cube," calculating when satellites will become visible above the horizon and thereby be able to be "acquired" (meaning the signal can be connected to systems). I'm not "suckin" anyone's cock. My words stem from direct knowledge.
Whatever you suppose, try calculating the space-diversity antenna locations for a long microwave path for frequencies at or above tens of megahertz. This is one way to confirm curvature of the Earth, although one must also account for atmospheric distortion.
You're not a serious contender. No further commentary on your suppositions and beliefs is warranted. Learn some spherical geometry and then set up your own experiments. You'll see, unless you flub the calculations.
My apologies, anon. I mistook you for the flat-earth psyop bread-eater.
Retracted.
>His solution is demurrage
This isn't a new idea; debasing the currency has been in vogue with governments (and many individuals) since the Roman empire, if not before. Shaving off bits of precious metals off coins; inflating away the value of fiat currency… same s***, different day.
>He proposes putting land into some form of public or community ownership and then distributing its rental value in socially useful ways
A modern take on some native American tribes' views of land use, but Gesell's twist has a dark side which would very quickly be used to disadvantage all but the 1%ers.
Many tribespeople's concept of land use was that no one can own the land in perpetuity. People used it when they needed it, cared for it as they were able, and left it when they no longer needed it or were able to care for it. Period.
This concept sounds good on paper, but it didn't prevent endless warring, raids and squabbling among the many tribes in pre-European-contact America.
>currency represents energy not information
Currency stands in for values, valuables, for what's important to you, for how much something is worth to the currency-holder. Which is why the LOVE OF money is the root of all evil, because loving money is empty and deceptive.
>mammon is a very nasty entity that has caused wars, murders, theft, usury, enslavement,
Mammon is not causative; it's a tool. Like guns. Guns are tools. Guns don't kill people; people kill people.
>With demurrage money, you either spend, invest, or lend it out quickly (even at 0% interest) because keeping it idle slowly costs you. This raises the velocity of money and cushions slumps.
>
This is exactly the system the "Federal" Reserve has in place; they're supposed to limit inflation to 2%, tops. Instead, they "try" to "keep it down" to 2% target. This steals purchasing power from people who hold cash. The wealthy have the means, advice and ability to keep their wealth invested in assets which accumulate value faster than the rate of inflation.
The poor have no assets nor the ability to buy assets, and what little they earn goes directly toward food, water, shelter, fees, taxes,licenses etc. So, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, because of inflation.
This is the system we already have. Nothing new.
Do you oppose poor people saving up so they can afford to buy a car, new clothing, items for their baby? Are they "hoarders" in your belief system? Would you demand they simply do without?
Do I understand you correctly, that you believe in an actual god named "mammon"? If so, why do you use lower-case for the name? My use of the word is strictly in the common reference to currency, whether shells, beads, precious-metals-based or fiat.
Have you never calculated the adjustment for dollar value (or whatever fiat currency is used where you live) over time, to account for inflation?
On my table I have an old bottle of DMSO and one I recently bought - the old one cost $11, the new one $26. Same exact product, same volume, same retail source. The difference is time, and the rate of inflation. Today I need more than double the nominal currency to buy the same stuff.
That's the lot of people who don't own assets and instead rely upon salaries or trading their time, skills and knowledge for money.
Perhaps you would benefit from reading "Rich Dad, Poor Dad."
>you dont need to attack me and say i dont want parents to provide for their families,
You read words I did not write. I didn't attack you - no ad hominem derives from sincere questions seeking to clarify a message.
In your preferred system, who decides the level to which ordinary people are permitted to save, before triggering the "hoarder" penalty box?
You write as though you may not have been through many decades of life. Over time, if you pay attention, you will see purchasing power eroding because of inflation. Nearly every country with an "independent" central bank is being subjected to this now.
Besides the book "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," I also recommend "The Creature from Jekyll Island" (not a scary movie, but a book about the politics and scullduggery behind the founding of the "Federal" Reserve).
>you are twisting my words, which is your professions,
I've already posted some of what I've done professionally. Never have I been paid to twist words. I've spent my life trading knowledge and technical expertise, creative ideas and problem-solving for fiat currency remuneration.
I've played a part in building the nation's electrical grid, micowave communications networks, cellular telephone systems, computer networks, local-area networks and enterprise-scale networks (the precursors of the internet), fiber-optic communication systems, cable television systems, solar-powered remote electronic stations, and satellite communication uplinks.
None of this work involved being paid to twist anyone's words. Through all of that work, I saved up and avoided debt where I could. I "own" my home (rent it from government because of property taxes) and one car. For both of these I had to go into debt for a while. For both of these the government continues to require permits, licenses, fees and taxes. Because of this, I cannot say I actually "own" anything of value, because the government can and will take it away if I'm unable to pay what is demanded.
Education is a prerequisite for self-government; I highly recommend it. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, so I encourage you to test any old ideas with a shiny new veneer against history and actual human experience.
Nope. I've never built a car or constructed a rocket or a battery.
Wow. Thank you, anon.
That'sNotable
every district judge and every magistrate judge from the Middle District of Tennessee — just recused themselves
>i dont see economist listed there in those deeds
If I were better at economics, I'd own some assets by now :-D
I have a lot of experience watching money come in and go out, watching my purchasing power being eroded away. And I've read a LOT of economics materials, from Michael Badnarik (Libertarian candidate for POTUS) and Ron Paul to G. Edward Griffin and many more.
I've also lived long enough, and paid attention long enough, to see every socialist scheme degrade the people who had to live under it.
Perhaps before your time, but have you heard he Beatles' "Taxman" song? Before Margaret Thatcher's time in office, ordinary people were taxed at nearly 80% of everything they earned (in addition to other taxes and fees). In the song, "there's one for you, 19 for me" is referring to how much of their earnings The Beatles were permitted to retain after income taxes.
I didn't notice a chapter-and-verse reference, so I'm at a disadvantage regarding to which parable you're referring. Jesus frequently discouraged his followers from clinging to material things. For instance, when he said to give a man the shirt off your back if he had no shirt. Is that the reference you're making?
Vladimir Lenin is the political figure who famously stated, "The goal of socialism is communism."
This quote reflects his Marxist-Leninist philosophy, which views socialism not as a final destination, but as a transitional phase where the working class controls the state and abolishes private property.
In practice, the few still control the many and siphon off wealth for their personal benefit, while the many are left without assets or even food security. Socialism/communism in practice represses everyone (except the ruling class) far worse than competing economic and political systems.
Tony Fauci, Ralph Barik and other perps arranged the illness and murder of hundreds of thousands of American, and they haven't yet seen the inside of a jail cell.
Our justice system is broken.
No, nothing that bleeding-edge, although I did help to implement SS7 (Signaling System Seven) and was around the industry when DARPANET was connected to USENET (the actual beginning of the internet).
Q posted that Trump is well protected. I hope that's still true.
You've misread Q's actual posts; else you've not actually read any and are merely trolling.
>do you think that they can take over the present darpa run internet by controlling those internet keys? would anyone notice if the internet was being served out on something like a space based platform?
Edward Snowden seems to think the internet's already been backdoored into a privacy-free zone. I think the currently popular demands for age verification will destroy the internet as it's been known up until now.
Governments will become gatekeepers (even if they outsource the work to tech firms) and only compliant drones will have access to whatever worthless propaganda remains online. That's a dystopian blackpill, and I hope I'm wrong. But that's the way the whole world is heading, using communist China as the gleaming example.
I've noticed the pattern that, whenever politicians bleat, "Think of the children!!" what they're really after is more power, wealth and control for themselves. Before Q, I always turned away when forked-tongue skinks began beating the "it's for the children" drum. Since Q, I've observed actual human trafficking networks being brought down, so I've modified my automatic distrust of cries about "it's for the children." In the case of ID for internet access, though, I cannot see any upside.
>explain how the common conception of Christian heaven is NOT a socialist paradise
Easy: Christian Heaven is an absolute monarchy. There is ONE being with ALL the power. No other entity has property, wealth or power.
Maybe the rift in the space-time continuum was closing when Q wrote they had to go for good.
>exactly the opposite of everything the real DJT stood for
Kinda like the Charlie Kirk Show after Charlie's untimely demise.
I don't have skills to create this meme, but I can picture it: Big bus, brighly-painted, a typical political campaigner's bus. "Socialism" written on the side; in the front where the destination would show, it says "Communism." "Free Candy" painted on the side in huge letters.
A line of people waiting to get into the open door. Just inside the door, a person handing a tiny piece of candy as the people enter, while pickpocketing the person with the other hand. Once on the bus, the occupants are left with just the one piece of candy while the pile of wealth by the driver/doorman/gatekeeper is overflowing.
There are at least four separate networks being built, using the general idea used by "smart"meters, or the IEEE Standard 802.15.6 (Internet of Bodies). There are also unfortunately counter-efforts underway to increase surveilance and control, such as SignalTrace's exploitation of license plate readers and Flock cameras…
https://www.technocracy.news/signaltrace-just-weaponized-your-airpods-with-license-plate-readers-nationwide/
John referred to Jesus as "Logos," the Word. He wrote that Jesus was with God in the beginning, and that Jesus WAS God. Then he declined to elaborate further, leaving we mere non-prophet humans to contemplate what exactly that means.
I've read reports that the crumbling building was the Pfizer building, now disused. I have not read who the current owner is, but have read it was being developed into "luxury apartments."
>be ironic if they used this skyscrapper event, sky event to disclose both 911 and covid 19
Nice idea, anon. That would be, for me, one of the more enjoyable parts of this movie.
OK Grammar Kitty, have some covfefe and I'll step in, only for a second:
conjunction = add something (usually a whole word) in [e.g. railroad is a conjunction of rail and road]
contraction = take something out (usually a signle letter) and mark its place with an apostrophe. [e.g. don't is a contraction of do and not]
Many people for whom English is a second language confuse possessive words having an apostrophe with contractions which also have an apostrophe.
The odd contradiction to the usual rules for apostrophes is the possessive "its" (showing ownership) and the contraction "it's" [it is].
Nailed it. That's why I used that particular conjunction :-)
I have the original hardback book. I like to send money to actual content creators (used to be called "authors"). PDFs are great for easy reference, if they're searchable. Thanks, anon.
>House in Fox Point, Wisconsin, was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright
That's some serious multigenerational wealth. The ruling class tends to protect the ruling class. This info makes anon curious about the criminal-protecting judge as well as the judge who protected her.
I suspect there might be more "there, there" than anons have yet exposed. Financial or political ties (as in, interdependencies)? Family ties?