First they came for Andrew Anglin, but I'm not a White nationalist so I said nothing.
Then they came for Alex Jones, but I'm not a listener, so I said nothing.
Then they came for Candace Owens, but I'm not on Twitter, so I said nothing…
c'mon lads, someone can flesh this out, right?
They are in the same category in that they were silenced on social media. The fact that all 3 mentioned typically have nothing whatsoever to do with each other ties them together - illustrating the point all the more: first extreme, then kooky, then black woman who crossed (((the line)))
think moar, think below surface level, anon. this is a multifront war here.
—————————————–
screencapping & archiving the links in Q's most recent post - will be added to the spreadsheet & offsite gallery
ARCHIVES for the documents Q posted:
1st document
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE
Memo Key Points
ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/3fCMC
2nd document
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE
FISA Title I Summary
ARCHIVE: https://archive.fo/UJ5ql
>Anons I believe their end goal is not to simply remove AJ off the web, it's to provoke an uncontrolled reaction from the MAGA movement and paint us as violent conspiracy theorists.
BINGO!
someone please GLOBAL REPORT that supid slut's titty pic - looks UNDERAGE
>Or does she have a different incredible explanation
She had a cold that affected her judgment, like when she leaked the transcript, you know…
>I don't get excited anymore, just frustrated.
Your lack of judgment and foresight and understanding is not Q's problem, it's yours. Your attitude is yours alone.
Adjust it or bow out, either way we'll be here.
>Might want to archive…
It's all you, bro, go right ahead & archive them all. Let us know when you're finished