Anons, quick word on The Hill's article about 'Anonymous' attacking us:

It's bullshit.

Read this article "How One Man Tracked Down Anonymous — and Paid a Heavy Price":

https://archive.fo/JMfcB

Pic related is an excerpt. Note the name of the leader.

This is the Anon that hates Pepe; there was a time when Anonymous had no logo, because logos can be coopted; great arguments once broke out over it at 4chan many years ago. What happened? SJW's started to pretend to represent Anonymous. Instead of doing everything for the Lulz, suddenly 'Anonymous' became SJW central. You saw Guy Fawkes masks being worn by every neckbeard Beta coast-to-coast.

The Hill doesn't speak for Anonymous, and neither does that Twitter account. Note that 'Anonymous' has gone into serious decline since the time of that article–where once it involved serious, technically gifted anons, now it primarily involves doxxing and swatting; all that requires is manpower and people willing to make a phone call. More than likely the real oldfag Anons saw what happened and stopped participating.

If manpower makes the difference, I call your attention to the recent numbers on 'qanon' searches: up 355% over all-time highs. If you take 8ch.net's normal traffic to be 250k users/day, that means that we're probably over 1.3mm visitors daily now—30% more than 4chan.

Stay the course, and never forget—Anonymous is us.