Is anyone else disappointed by the document drop? It looked to me like executive summary or opening arguments. But there was no SAUCE!
Yeah, that's another problem. Lots of redactions. But if you tell me that the Russians or the Chinese want such and such, that's just a statement. HOW do they know that the Russians or the Chinese want such and such? Or what's the evidence that Venezuelan elections were rigged? Statements, but no sauce.
That may be true. But they didn't provide that in the dump. At least I didn't see that in the several docs in that zip.
Yes, a lot has been happening in the last few years and the last several days. But one thing we learned doing the Q work is what is a fact and what is just statements about something. We were taught to dig and provide something real. I've seen more real stuff about 2020 on these boards that in those documents provided tonight.
Here's the thing. Pres. Trump addressed the people and provided a link. Nothing in what I saw in that link is going to convince anyone because the proofs are not there.
But maybe what is intended by the dump is to let people know that the IC knows what they've been up to?
Yes, of course. And we've been cursing at our TVs for the last 10 years, if we bothered to watch.
But I guess what I am asking is, Was the whole thing about putting the midwits etc. on notice?
I recall anons sharing internet traffic data on election night. Now, that would be proof.
Yes, I remember both of those. Very good sources, totally ignored.
So how does what happened tonight advance anything?
The media has spent a lot more time deluding the public. In the run-up to the speech, they were talking about "unsubstantiated" evidence.
But unfortunately, what was provided tonight lacks substance. I didn't see anything in that report other than statements. It was narrative without any proof. It doesn't help the cause.
Maybe there's intent to add to what was dropped? Something real, maybe, rather than just someone's assessment?
The comments about the Democratic Socialists of America that I've seen in the last few days have been compelling.
Their cuckoo strategy is noteworthy: infiltrating the party and pushing out mainstream Democrats.
Moderate Democrats might actually understand what's going on there.
The one thing I will concede is that there was a statement in there about these foreign countries paying reporters to share their narrative. Maybe Q's "follow the money" applies here.
The other option might be to find publicly available sources to back all of those statements in the reports. The IC can't/won't reveal sources and methods, but we are under no such requirement.
They stoked gun violence fears to make us easier to conquer.
Much of Harvard's funding came from the CCP, most likely. When I was doing COVID research, I found press releases about some $365M granted to Harvard by Chinese sources.
Images are not expanding tonight. sigh
They could potentially lose their broadcast licenses for that.