posting this again, because I find it incredibly damning and to me shows that
they are scrambling to create cover anyway possible.
notice that after starting with Obama being faked,
that the working example chosen by this Asian researcher to showcase his work is the re-creation of an interview with a Holocaust survivor.
also notice Tom Hanks who is recently receiving negative attention makes an appearance in this.
Coincidence that it is a very recent TED talk. 7/25/18
You can't make this shit up…….oh wait.
This is how they will defend any incriminating video?
This is proactive programming of doubt and mistrust in any possible claims
of evidence of criminal activity said to have been captured or recorded in digital video.
So now video evidence can be suppressed or not allowed in court trial proceedings?
A judge will rule that a jury may not use any evidence given or previously witnessed by video in a given case and will not allow it's submission into court records?
They will say those videos that show the talking heads reciting the 4am talking points are computer software generated fakes.
They will use this as proof, many, most, a majority will fall for it?
What other videos will they say are fake?
Expect a huge push of fake videos of everything or perhaps an unveiling of many examples that have been in use already
and people have believed and not been aware of.
Truth does not matter.
Notice the presenter mentions an additional software to detect altered video but does not go into detail or show examples. Just that there is or they are working on it.
Expect the state to appoint experts and to put in place legal authority to accredit or sanction what is real or fake.
Trust them because (you) do not have the capacity to know what is real and true.
This is total clown fuckery.
If something is killed.
Is it True that it is Dead?