Reminder since FISA DECLAS imminent:
If we look at Q's posts, there's a 95% likelihood NoName is in the redacted portions of the FISA.
What I'm trying to figure out is, how will NoName's role be portrayed in the FISA? Will it show him as another "separate" source of information, when in actuality he passed on the same damn dossier they've included several times as "separate" evidence?
Deleted and reposted. “Our” changed to “are”. Space added between ! and “also”
Da fuh? He waited a while to correct this one. Spacing error corrected.
Forgot to include screenshot.
>Notice the !A
>another proof!!
Don't just say it's a proof without providing evidence/context. For instance, I have no idea how in the fuck "!A" is a proof
Sure as shit is.
Can someone explain to me why this is notable? I've kind of always seen the "Q Clock" as questionable at best.
For instance, everyone here is always telling me timelines change…but somehow the Q clock dates and mirrors still match up?