>2485446 (lb, for TIRESIAS)
>I'm trying to help you
You can't give what you don't have. You NEED the help, have you talked with a professional about your obsessions?
s/n: Q will never post on your board, the .depressed anons @ /QR2gen/ thought that Q would follow them too, and got nothing but shill bots & blackpills for their work
You have so much more than you know.
SO MUCH!
I was asking if Tiresias has talked to professionals, because it seems to me that those conversations have already occurred. I sincerely don't think that Tiresias is here of their own free will
Who helps an open enemy? AJ made himself just that, and is now being punished by his handlers for failing. The beauty in it all, Q didn't even have to say his name, he fell for Q's bait!
Fishing is fun!
never noticed that, nice catch!
I did when he/she was first identified, my reason for alternatively calling it a he and a she
>>2485753 Did you REALLY read all of those that quickly? 3 minutes? Ok…
The timing. It was exactly the time when AJ and [Corsi] were hopping on the Q bandwagon. Those of us who were there, remember it clearly. As for necessary disinfo, that's totally different than trying to usurp the message and claim it as your own. Also claiming comms with Q, no good. Again, actually fucking re_read all of this. And it wasn't for only AJ, it was for ALL past/resent/future who tried to hijack Q's message for their own reasons (glory, money, followers, misleading, etc etc etc. This is too important to tolerate derailing in any form.
In the sense of future proves past, yes. All of those drops, however, are 100% relevant to thie subject matter. Witnessed it all, haven't missed a day. Context matters.
Agreed. Today is only future proving past in this regard, Q was right about letting them ALL dig heir own graves.
[Time to move on]
Q's thoughts on the matter:
Fine, if projecting is what you want to do, disregard what i say, & re_read relevant Q crumbs only.
Or disregard this altogether, if you don't read it, someone else will
If it doesn't matter what Q wants to "rant" about, why are you here on Q research, which is founded on Q's "rants"?
I said earlier that [AJ] is MSM, and got shilled hard for it. Well, what about [infowars] wasn't mainstream? None of them answered that one IIRC.
WTF? Google? Well well, they're all closer than appears on the surface! Good eye anon
<muh false profits, i mean, prophecy
>>2486202 Glad to…
Wish I'd done it for the morning shill storm
Be careful who you are following.png
Same boom boom fag, different day