Anonymous ID: 4258b3 July 27, 2026, 5:37 p.m. No.24876500   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6541

>>24876479

I may be wrong since the whole tranny nomenclature thing always confused me a bit, but I think "transgender boys" would be biological females. If so it would sorta make sense, lots more than the other way around which would just be an obvious grift op.

Anonymous ID: 4258b3 July 27, 2026, 5:56 p.m. No.24876573   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24876541

Yeah I'm not arguing it isn't absurd, just that it isn't totally moronic. Fine distinction maybe but these days gotta take what we can get or just go insane like the the NPCs.