>>2486378

Everyone 1st amendment is under attack. Chinese model coming;

UK rules tech companies financially liable for website content.

Censorship WW

But NO

Some anons would rather be Nazi apologists then defend free speech; ironically while we tolerate them.

Because of Free Speech.

You anons see where this is going?

FF

Hurt reporter

SM scheduled for Chinese system.

"at least they stopped sneaking around… lets get this party started bitches."

before FF?

>>2487915

GW anon…

Reverses church hearing ruling…

Makes CNN and others State Media

>>2487964

or rather

Deep State Media

>>2487821

But the

Vague inference was made by AJ and Corsi, over a Q drop…

We should defend the 1st Amendment and the day we dont is the day we lose it;

>>2487877

>>2488099

SM argues itself as public and then changes to private when convenient; cant have it both ways.

Technology is the way we communicate.

>>2488142

Surprised you werent greeted with

KYS *EXPLETIVE

*mouth frothing responses

for trying to show some balls and brains.