tyb
>>24878715 lb
>>24878694 lb
>>24878644 lb
>>24878668 lb
>>24878635 lb
continuation
Theater of the Mind: Barrett Brown Talking with Jasun Horsley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngb3-gOPK88
Orwell’s Limitations & Demoralization
Brown argues that modern algorithmic surveillance, private intelligence firms, and “revelation of the method” go beyond what Orwell imagined in 1984.
Openly revealing techniques can itself demoralize and neutralize opposition more effectively than pure secrecy.
Historical parallels (including suppression of Orwell’s work) are drawn.
Couple things here:
==no way what's happening now is comparable to '1984' novel narration. If you read it, you would know.
They must be using "1984" as a buzz word
Orwell's '1984' paradigm imagined a government enlisting BRUTE FORCE, not drugs, mind control, nor demoralization, nor persuasion nor poisoned entertainment; That would be Huxley's "Brave New World" paradigm.
If these two think we've already reached "Orwell" stage and truly believe that; and are not BS-ing?
THEN, you might understand why they seemingly fail to feel threatened by Mamdani, communist totalitarianism.
Orwell's myth was about Communists; Soviets; and the same with Orwell's book "Animal Farm"
We are not there yet. Even Jasun, in Canada, is not there yet.
i think these people failed to actually read the book??
Discouragement op would be under the heading of "Brave New World' for psychological control
Not '1984' which is straight out Boot on the Neck
Broader Power Dynamics
Privatization of intelligence, shifting alliances among tech figures (Peter Thiel, Elon Musk mentions appear), Epstein networks, and the difficulty of remaining un-co-opted once you gain any real influence in these spaces.
(I guess the Globalists One World people either bribe or threaten you to get you to join. Or kill you, if not? )
That's why Paytriots seem, to a man, to be co-opted;
Anybody who has a following.
And it is why they come so hard against this Board.
ARG (alternate reality game) in the context of the Barrett Brown Interview
In the conversation with Jasun Horsley, Barrett Brown discusses ARGs in a more critical, intelligence-and-memetic-warfare sense. He treats them as potential tools for:
Audience capture and data mining
Behavior modification
Fracturing public consensus
Running large-scale psychological operations under the cover of entertainment or grassroots movements
He specifically examines QAnon as a possible large-scale ARG (involving figures such as Ron Watkins, Thomas Schoenberger, Michael Flynn, and Peter Thiel) and raises the idea that certain high-profile events (including the Charlie Kirk incident referenced in the talk) could function as teaching moments or staged narrative operations with ARG-like elements.
No such thing as bad publicity?
So in short:
Normally an ARG is a sophisticated marketing or entertainment experience.
In the interview’s framing, it is also viewed as a sophisticated method of information warfare and social engineering.
method of information warfareis correct.
fracturing consensus?their fear?
rather than building it, as we are accused of, by the shill?
We are accused of trying to build an alternative consensus, when the actual fear is of breaking their consensus?
They were so worried about us building consensus (from facts, images and discussions of history)?
All that time it was about breaking their consensus? i.e. Their fear.
A monolithic Propaganda program builds one consensus; Wouldn't introducing doubt end up leaving room for truth?
Also, such a project would acclimate citizens into using their mind to look, think, riddle, discuss and to be unafraid to have their own opinions, separate from consensus.
It would be like putting your toe in the water after a lifetime of being a victim of "What people think"?
I would say that was, and is, a good thing.