Trump’s new DOJ pick could finally bring the censorship cartel to its knees 7/29/26 1/3

Behold! A hero for America emerges, and he taketh the form of a wonky Jewish law professor.

On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced the nomination of Adam Candeub for the post of Assistant Attorney General. If confirmed,Candeub will helm the Department of Justice’s antitrust division.

The Republican Senate has inexplicably lollygagged when it comes to advancing many Trump appointees,but Candeub’s nomination may see action soon — a hearing is expected on August 5.. Hopefully, a vote will soon follow, and with so much at stake, Senate Republicans should immediately confirm the president’s appointeeif they care at all about taking the fight to the left-wing censorship leviathan while they have the chance.

How can Revolver be so confident that Candeub is a star pick for DOJ?

For one, a safe bet withany Trump nominee is to judge them by what “neutral” information sources use to complain about them. With that in mind, let us head over to the swamp of Wikipedia, which maintains a brief profile of Candeub’s career.Under the section on the professor’s views, the free encyclopedia musters only one assertion worthy of mention:

“In 2024, Candeub criticized the National Institutes of Health’sdiscouragement of research advancing scientific racism, comparing it to the persecution of Galileo.”

But the article Wikipedia refers to didn’t mention race at all. It criticized NIH’s policy of denying researchers access to genetic data when the work touched areasNIH considered “potentially stigmatizing,”a policy that blocked research on Alzheimer’s, obesity, and addiction.

Call it the Revolver Rule of Trump Nominations: If all the left has is a lazy, half-baked accusation of racism, chances are a nominee is really good.

But in Candeub’s case, “really good” undersells it.

America and MAGA deserve an antitrust enforcer who understands the full scope of ways that corporate collusion can endanger American well-being. Today, monopolists don’t just have the power to impose higher prices on Americans — they also have the power to strip away their rights or enforce a political ideology. Candeub’s career shows he understands that and is ready to fight. Adam Candeub is a man with both the courage and the know-how to be a critical warrior for the MAGA agenda.

One of the most important struggles of the past decade of American politics — perhapsthe single most important one — has been the fight to preserve Americans’ freedom of speech rights against aggressive bids to curtail themby America’s parastate of big tech companies working in concert with academia, media,the NGO blob,and the national security state. In response to President Trump’s initial 2016 victory, howls about “hate” and “Russian disinformation”were used to push even tighter controls. Finding new ways to impose censorship became the great passion of the tech world throughout Trump’s first administration.

The rise of "hate speech detection" as a field of machine learning during the closure of the Internet. The field did not exist prior to 2016. From "A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of Hate Speech Detection on Social Media Sites." pic.twitter.com/0BKdshcqj9

— arctotherium (@arctotherium42) July 23, 2026

In 2020, mass censorship regarding Covid, Hunter Biden’s laptop, and a lot more was critical to making Joe Biden the president. After January 6, even President Trump himself was banished from every major online social network.

In 2021, the future for speech looked bleak. But the tide has turned — and Professor Candeub is one of the key figures making it happen.

https://revolver.news/2026/07/adam-candeub-trump-new-doj-pick-could-finally-bring-censorship-cartel-to-its-knees/

>>24883587

2/3

College professors are typically an uninspiring bunch this century, best known for pettiness and groupthink.Even among the puny number of professors who support MAGA, many are terrified to speak up,worried they might endanger the academic posts it took them years of ass-kissing to obtain.

Candeub, to say the least, is not like that. As a law professor, Candeub was admirably fearless. When Trump was indicted by Fani Willis in Fulton County, Candeub was eager “to tell any interested person that the indictment is bullshit.”. His Rate My Professors page includes one review that carries the warning “snowflakes stay home.” Another remarks on his use of “non-PC language.” But at the same time, students who don’t share his politics praise his vast intelligence and have called him “engaging and fair.”

A Michigan State law professor since 2004, Candeub could easily have coasted as a quiet Trump supporter in a job it’d be virtually impossible to fire him from, barring some kind of egregious misconduct. Instead, as tech censorship began itsugly surge in the years of President Trump’s first term, Candeub stepped forward to spearhead the fight against it.

In the final year of Trump 1.0,Candeub joined the National Telecommunications and Information Administration as deputy assistant secretary, and within four months was elevated to acting assistant secretary of commerce for communications and information, the job that runs the agency.There he implemented the president’s executive order targeting online censorship. That same year, White House officials made afirst attempt at slotting Candeub into the antitrust enforcement job. Attorney General William Barr sabotaged the move, though, ostensibly on the grounds thatCandeub was too inexperienced.

Thwarted but undeterred, Candeub spent the following four years as a leading figure in laying the legal and policy groundwork for a second, greater Trump administration.

Back in 2020, while most of the country was convulsed by Covid and George Floyd,Candeub published an article in the Yale Journal of Law & Technology titled “Bargaining for Free Speech: Common Carriage, Network Neutrality, and Section 230.” Beneath thebland title was an important idea. Candeub proposed simply treating America’s social media giants the same as ISPs and telephone companies — label them as “common carriers” who, because they serve the entire public, are barred from discriminating against any part of it.Doing so, he said, would protect free speech and American companies from intrusive interference from both competitors and the government. “One of common carriage’s anti-discrimination obligations’ great virtues isthat it protects private entities from complying with government’s censorship demands,” Candeub explained. “A private company with no legal obligation to treat users in a non-discriminatory fashion readily can accede government’s request to censor, block, or otherwise treat users unfairly.But, if a private firm is prohibited by law to do so, then the government cannot even ask. Thus, a unified liability regime is necessary to protects users and the free flow of ideas from the weakest link.”

The article received little attention until the spring of 2021, when Justice Clarence Thomas cited it in a concurring opinion. “In many ways, digital platforms that hold themselves out to the public resemble traditional common carriers,” Thomas wrote. “Though digital instead of physical, they are at bottom communications networks, and they ‘carry’ information from one user to another. […] Similar to utilities, today’s dominant digital platforms derive much of their value from network size.”

In the words of The Washington Post,Thomas’s opinion “sent shock waves through Silicon Valley” — a rare feat for a 12-page concurrence!

https://revolver.news/2026/07/adam-candeub-trump-new-doj-pick-could-finally-bring-censorship-cartel-to-its-knees/

>>24883594

3/3

Candeub then wrote the final chapter of Project 2025, laying out what a new MAGA administration could do to reform the Federal Trade Commission.

In the chapter,Candeub called for taking decisive action against the coercive use of DEI and ESG to inject left-wing political prioritiesinto American corporate life while also skirting the law.

“Antitrust law can combat dominant firms’ baleful effects on democratic institutions such as free speech, the marketplace of ideas, shareholder control, and managerial accountability as well as collusive behavior with government,” Candeub wrote. “Practices such as Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) requirements on publicly traded corporations and their inclusion in business agreements, the so-called “de-banking” of industries and individuals, and the interference of large internet firms with democratic political discourse undermine liberal democracy, a truly open society, and, indeed, rule of law.”

To fix the problem, Candeub called forthe FTC to “set up an ESG/DEI collusion task force to investigate firms—particularly in private equity—to see if they are using the practice as a means to meet targets, fix prices, or reduce output.”

In short, Candeub gets it.He is a man who sees the value —the necessity — of embracing a grander vision for the DOJ’s antitrust arm. Breaking up anticompetitive monopolies still matters, of course — and where they exist, Americans can expect Candeub to act.But America also needs an enforcer ready to take action when a bank tries to close a customer’s account due to their tweets, when a startup can’t get a loan because it is willing to work with ICE,or when an asset manager uses trillions under management to enforce climate orthodoxy across the business world.

While Candeub cares deeply about Big Tech censorship, he is not beholden to a “Populism, Inc.” perspective of deploying antitrust tools recklessly. Indeed, he has spoken out against burdensome antitrust proposals that would simply harm American tech companies without addressing the underlying problem of censorship.

Adam Candeub is ready to act, and he knows exactly how.The only thing standing between him and the job is a Senate vote, and there is no good reason to delay it.Americans will be blessed to have him fighting on their behalf these next few years at DOJ. The Senate should send him there posthaste.

https://revolver.news/2026/07/adam-candeub-trump-new-doj-pick-could-finally-bring-censorship-cartel-to-its-knees/

MAZE

@mazemoore

This video is pretty damning. Fauci telling on himself.

September, 2022. Fauci claims that the majority of scientists believe that the virus occurred naturally instead of leaking from a lab.

Fauci joked about the "conspiracy" that he had scientists "on a string" and that he tried to control their opinions.

Released documents show THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HE DID!

https://x.com/mazemoore/status/2082436224313360476

>>24883658

Remember all the scientists WW (1,000s of them) that knew it wasn’t by nature, got damned by Fauci and his crowd, banned from their professions, and worse. Yes Science knew Fauci was lying and they were saying it was all bullshit! What an ugly lying, killer Fauci is, there has got to be a way to get him banned and he should be in jail for the rest of his life! Along with all the liars that make bucks by him. There are many drug companies made millions and still are.

>>24882817, >>24882836 (You), >>24882895, >>24882914, >>24882927, >>24883224 SHAKING, sad and disgruntled fauci is best fauci

PN

I think I know why Fauci is shaking and scared shitless, their are millions of people that lost family members, over a million died in the U.S. alone, they are projecting their anger and hatred to him as they hear him lie again and again. He really should have kept his fucking mouth shut. It’s the first time we get to see him exposed as the killer he is. He’d be safer in jail than on the loose.