>>2479183 (last)
Michael Flynn Jr., and Scott Adams right after meeting with Potus both saying Q isn't real.
But the statement is ridiculous. There is certainly someone(s) who posts under a tripcode and signs as Q. That is beyond doubt.
So why are their statements so imprecise? "Q is nothing." That's clearly wrong, Q is something, whatever you think of it. Because they're not serious statements. They're capable of making much more nuanced statements that would not be provably wrong, but they didn't.
I don't know why they are saying this now, but there's much I don't know that I just watch and see what happens.
Who knows why Trump's main theme song during the campaign was "You can't always get what you want"!? Another thing I don't understand, maybe he didn't want the crowds to go over the top in enthusiasm. And maybe the same here. Q is to be publicized slowly.