Anonymous ID: d9269e Aug. 6, 2018, 6:12 p.m. No.2488594   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8627 >>8661 >>8671 >>8747 >>8759 >>8782 >>8784 >>8816 >>8820 >>8984 >>9188

>>2479183 (last)

Michael Flynn Jr., and Scott Adams right after meeting with Potus both saying Q isn't real.

 

But the statement is ridiculous. There is certainly someone(s) who posts under a tripcode and signs as Q. That is beyond doubt.

 

So why are their statements so imprecise? "Q is nothing." That's clearly wrong, Q is something, whatever you think of it. Because they're not serious statements. They're capable of making much more nuanced statements that would not be provably wrong, but they didn't.

 

I don't know why they are saying this now, but there's much I don't know that I just watch and see what happens.

 

Who knows why Trump's main theme song during the campaign was "You can't always get what you want"!? Another thing I don't understand, maybe he didn't want the crowds to go over the top in enthusiasm. And maybe the same here. Q is to be publicized slowly.

Anonymous ID: d9269e Aug. 6, 2018, 6:40 p.m. No.2489104   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9138 >>9140 >>9157

>>2488599

Boomer here.

 

A lot of what's written here is true, or at least partly true. I've been appalled by a lot of this stuff as we went along. Our life hasn't been easy because ever since Reagan (elected by the gen. before us) exported the jobs, the stability our fathers had at work has not been here.

 

The "Greatest Generation" or maybe even the one before them was responsible for Social Security. Economists call such a scheme "intergenerational wealth transfer." You take from your kids, but then they can take from their kids, etc. A few problems with it:

 

(1) The first generation to do it takes from their kids, but nobody took from them. They can call themselves heroes as a sort of moral justification for it, I suppose.

 

(2) It works best in times of fast population growth, so there are lots of younger workers to take from. But the rate of (proportional) population growth per generaion slowed down, and so Social Security started having problems.

 

(3) Life expectancies have gone up. Most people were supposed to be dead by 65 or soon after, so SS would not have to pay out for many years. The life expectancy went up, now we're raising the age limit to start to keep up.

 

(4) The points above give an excuse for mass immigration, so the population can grow and pay into social insurance. But it has been used for worthless immigration, people who will take more than they pay in. So the "elite" can take advantage of the SS problems to play their games.

 

The main points above are (1) and (2). These were predictable in advance. But that generation, during FDR's early years of presidency, wanted their old-age security, and they got it.