Anonymous ID: eaaab6 Aug. 6, 2018, 6:27 p.m. No.2488850   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8876

>>2488795

 

>>2462073 1986 U.S. District Court Dost test sets guidelines for No CP images

 

This is the blatant fake CP controversy propaganda I was referring to BO. I should have specified that previously, my bad.

 

NOW EXPLAIN WHY EXACTLY YOU'RE CREATING A DECEPTIVE, NEGATIVE, DIVISIVE IMAGE OF THE BOARD WITH YOUR FAKE CP CONTROVERSY

Anonymous ID: eaaab6 Aug. 6, 2018, 6:49 p.m. No.2489284   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Some one run that shit through the nag-a-ram and see what we got. It's potential should be obvious. Also, look at the missing letter. Collect up all our conspicuous "errors" among all relevant tweeteurs. Let's see if there is a message lurking anons.

Anonymous ID: eaaab6 Aug. 6, 2018, 6:52 p.m. No.2489342   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Can anons stop shitting on every public figure who hasn't been doing the research for the past fucking year? It's stupid and divisive to not at least give them the credit of their skepticism. We all had our skeptical period and they're coming to this A LOT LATE.