Anonymous ID: 50d00a Aug. 3, 2026, 1:06 p.m. No.24899924   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9951 >>0003

The two lettuce poop deaths that are now making the rounds on all the news sites are so misleading. They hype the deaths, but won’t give the ages of the victims.

The reason this is so disingenuous is that they give an age range of who is “mostly affected” , people age 30-39.

BUT very elderly and very sick people alos get sick and are likely the actual deaths.

They throw in the most likely to get lettuce poop diarrhea to muddy the story.

People who die is not told to the reader, elderly and u underlying health conditions.

Notice how the articles DO include the underlying health conditions part of the deaths.

See how that works to scare the public.

So what RX or vaccine will be pushed for this kind of event.

There is always an incentive for the news to push “scary news”.

The push one factoid about the bad news, and skirt the factual details, because if they also said the AGES of who died, the news would be a nothing burger of two already ill people, dying via dehydration from diarrhea which is always a factor if you are already ill.

This needs to be spoken about everywhere so normies finally see in real time how the tactics work and maybe understand to always ask questions before passing on faulty, details missing, “news”, that make the story less interesting or important.

Anonymous ID: 50d00a Aug. 3, 2026, 1:13 p.m. No.24899951   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0003

Ask.

Why do all of the articles leave out the actual ages of the two death victims.

 

Not just say range of “mostly affected”.

 

“Mostly affected age range” and ages of who actually “died with underlying health issues” are two totally different things.

 

Both are true as anyone who eats lettuce can get sick.

 

Difference is how bad are things for the ages of lettuce eaters.

 

Same shit as covid news.

 

News cycle tactics for clicks.

 

Or for what?

 

>>24899924

Anonymous ID: 50d00a Aug. 3, 2026, 1:26 p.m. No.24900003   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24899951

>>24899924

The deeper dive of why no age specific say due ro hiipa laws. And to allow family time to grieve.

Hiipa does not allow birthdates to be shared.

NOT hiding factual ages of death victims.

There is no giving away of personal details to factually state two different ages.

 

If in fact the two deaths were say 67 or 82, it would quell the news as opposed to 30-39.

 

The CDC needs to be asked if the two deaths were in the age range of 30- 39. Or were they elderly sick people with underlying conditions.

 

There.

See how any one reporter could ask the question and no hiipa response could shield the details.